THE COUNCIL OF TRENT CONVENES TO CONSIDER JOHN D'S EXPULSION FROM THE CONGREGATION OF LEE'S BLOG

I hadn't checked John's blog Antigrammargrinch in a long time. When I just checked it, I discovered the perfidious rascal is pasting the messages he stirs up on my blog to his. Now that is plagiarism flat out. It also is a sign that he can't blog under his own power. He has to ping off me and purloin entries from my blog. That's the highest form of flattery.

John admires this aged and frail granny and wants to get her attention. My children, grandchildren, and students have educated me on that maneuver. The truth is that I am John's role model.


John must have gone to lot of trouble to create my image collage on Antigrammargrinch. You have to admit that it is funny. I laughed the first time I saw it and showed it to my husband.

I don't remember the picture from which John lifted that head. But the legs are lies. I have great legs. All my family has great legs. Those big meaty collage legs don't come close to my elegant legs. John has never seen me in person. Were he to do so, he would have to admit that my legs are top of the line. Great legs last all your life; legs are the last to go. So I am sitting pretty when it comes to legs. lee



Folks, it has come to the time when I must make a decision about allowing John D's posts on my blog. I am torn because I think dissent keeps us sharp and fulfils the Constitution's First Amendment, without which we would have no democracy. I have cured him of potty mouth locutions, I believe. And I think his criticisms of me are valuable insights into what an opposite mind thinks. It's always a plus to know an enemy's thinking. But I have gotten tired of John. I believe he badly needs therapy at this time in his life, for he seems to be both very young and very smart to me. He needs to spend his energies on more valuable exercises at this time in his life than hounding a granny who's trying to impact the school board's way of treating teachers. Weigh in with your thoughts. Should John stay, or should John go? lee

From: John__D [mailto:noreply-comment@blogger.com]
Sent: Sunday, November 01, 2009 6:44 AM
To: tdecesar@tampabay.rr.com
Subject: [Lee Drury De Cesare's Casting-Room Couch] New comment on This Says It All with Addenda.

John__D has left a new comment on your post "This Says It All with Addenda":

Lee, how tiresome do you think some of your posts become? WHY DO YOU READ THEM, THEN? The your/you're cracks, the $340 per day/hour rot, I MADE A MISTAKE BACK WHEN THE ALAFIA FIASCO WAS GOING ON. I SHOULD HAVE STUCK WITH THE MISTAKE AND REFUSED TO BE CONVINCED OTHERWISE. I CAN DO SUCH DEEDS WITH A STRAIGHT FACE. IT RUNS OPPONENTS CRAZY. I DIDN' MAKE A MISTAKE ABOUT ELIA'S PLAN TO PAY $4500 EACH FOR SMITH AND HER VICE-PRINCIPAL TO GO TO ECKERD FOR A MIND ADJUSTMENT AT $4500 EACH. HAD THAT BEEN A TEACHER WHO FAILED TO GET ALONG WITH A WHOLE SCHOOL, HE OR SHE WOULD HAVE GOTTEN THE OLD PROFESSIONAL-STANDARDS GULAG HEAVE HO. the mullet hairdo insults, I LEARNE3D ABOUT MULLET HAIRDOS FROM MY READERS. I NOW HAVE A NEW INSULT IN MY ARSENA THANKS TO MY BLOG GANG. THE IMAGE MAKES ME LAUGH. I'M GLAD TO HAVE IT IN MY ARSENAL. and the same old "Earl the Pearl", I COUNT THIS ONE OF MY MORE INSPIRED LOCUTIONS. EARL THE PEARL AND OTHER ADMINISTRATORS AND SOME BOARD MEMBERS WERE ON THE TAKE IN THE ERWIN SCANDAL. ONLY AN IDIOT COULD NOT HAVE SEEN THAT. "Mileto the Munchkin" and "Pole-Girl Elia"NO, JENNIFER name-calling (satire?) READ THE GREATS OF SATIRE. NAME-CALLING IS A MAJOR TOOL IN THEIR KITS. wore WORN thin. I'm sick of reading about your shoes I AM NOT SICK OF MY SHOES. I LOVE THE DARLING THINGS. and how everyone who isn't a teacher is illiterate. SOME TEACHERS ARE ILLITERATE TOO. USUALLY THESE GRADUATED FROM THIRD-TIER COLLEGES. BUT TEACHERS HOLD UP THE WORLD OF LITERACY ON THEIR OVERWORKED SHOULDERS. You want to give a letter to the board outlining that a homeless person would be an improvement, THAT WAS NOT MY FORMULA: IT CAME FROM A READER. I THINK THE READER WAS INSPIRED. I THINK HE OR SHE WAS ON THE MONEY. yet you have slammed Home Ec degrees for months. TO A RADICAL FEMINIST SUCH AS I HAVE BEEN FOR 45 YEARS, THE DEGREE IS SEXIST. CAN ANYONE IMAGINE A WOMAN GETTING ON THE SUPREME COURT WITH A HOME-EC DEGREE? IT IS NOT A SUITABLE CREDENTIAL FOR A PERSON MAKING $150,000 A YEAR TO RULE ON THE BEHAVIOR OF TEACHERS AND TORTURE THEM WHEN POSSIBLE WITH THE PROSPECT OF LOSING THEIR JOBS FOR SOME MINOR OFFENSE, NOT ADMINISTRATORS, JUST TEACHERS GET PUNISHED BY THE PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS OFFICE. I ASKED AS PUBLIC INFORMATION FOR FILES ON ADMINISTRATORS PUNISHED: PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS HAD NONE.

I'm telling you that it becomes tiresome. This is fine if you keep it to your blog, but how tiresome do you think it becomes for those who receive your emails en masse? THEY ARE LUCKY DOGS. I SAY WHAT EVERYBODY KNOWS IS TRUE BUT WON'T UTTER IT, BECAUSE IF THEY DID THEY WOULD LOSE THEIR JOBS. Although it's your prerogative to write it on your blog, you seem to think it's okay to hassle everyone else with your tiresome unsolicited "satire". I ASSURE YOU THAT THE EMAILS SENT TO THE SCHOOL PEOPLE ARE DEVOURED BY THE RECIPIENTS. THEY ARE WHISPERED ABOUT IN OFFICES AND PASSED ALONG IN THE HALLS. THE FORTUNATE RECIPIEENTS KNOW WHAT I SAY IS TRUE, AND THE HONEST ONES SAY "THANK GOD" THAT SOMEONE IS SPEAKING THE TRUTH BECAUSE EVERYBODY ELSE IS SCARED TO LOSE THEIR JOBS. THEY COULD PUT A BLOCK SENDER ON ME IF THEY DID NOT WANT TO RECEIVE MY EMAILS.

Oh, I can knock off the back and forth "BACK-AND-FORTH" SHOULD GET HYPHENS. with Vox easily. I would like nothing more than to have the original question answered (or even stony salience like I usually receive) rather than having profanities hurled at me. NOW YOU ARE BEING TWO-FACED. YOU ARE AN ADDICT OF POTTY LINQUISTICS. GOADER KICKED YOU OFF HIS BLOG FOR YOUR HABITUAL POTTY MOUTH. But if I hadn't stood up and told Vox where to go right back at her, I don't think you would have said a word. BINGO. YOU ARE RIGHT. I AM FOND OF VOX EVEN WITH HER EXCESSES AND PARANOIA. SHE MAKES ME LAUGH. AND SHE KNOWS SO MANY HIDDEN TRUTHS ABOUT THE BAY AREA. IF SHE IS AFTER SOMETHING, SHE LEAVES NO STONE UNTURNED TO TRACK IT DOWN. LOOK HOW MUCH RESEARCH SHE DID RECENTLY TO FIND THE FBI RULES. I WOULDN'T HAVE THAT ZEAL, AND I AM A PRETTY GOOD RESEARCHER MYSELF. VOX IS THE BEST.

Meanwhile, I get told I'm un-American and unconstitutional. THAT'S BETTER THAN BEING CALLED BATHROOM EPITHETS. Perhaps if you'd told Vox to lay off in the first place, much of the back and forth could have been avoided. I DOUBT IT. YOU WOULD HAVE PICKED AT HER NO MATTER WHAT. NOW I AM PONDERING WHETHER TO KICK YOU OFF MY BLOG LIKE GOADER DID. I CAN'T FOR THE LIFE OF ME UNDERSTAND WHY YOU BOTHER WITH A BLOG WHICH YOU FIND SO OFFENSIVE TO YOUR SENSIBILITIES. DO YOU JUST GO WHRE YOU GET ATTENTION, OR DO YOU REALLY HAVE ETHICAL PROBLEMS WITH WHAT MY BLOG SPONSORS: FAIRNESS TO THE ABUSED TEACHERS OF THE COUNTY'S SCHOOLS AND CONTEMPT FOR THE BOARD AND ADMINISTRATION THAT ABUSES THEM?

I WILL HATE TO KICK YOU OFF BE4CAUSE THAT GOES AGAINST MY FREE-SPEECH CONVICTIONS. BUT IT MAY HAVE COME TOP THAT, JOHN. MAKE A CASE FOR MY KEEPING YOU AS A CONTRIBUTOR IF YOU CAN, GIVEN THE PURPOSE OF MY BLOG. YOU HAVE OTHER OUTLETS FOR YOUR VITRIOL; MINE IS NOT THE ONLY BLOG ON THE WEB. I WANT TO BE FAIR TO A READER AND CONTRIBUTOR, BUT I THINK YOU ARE A SPECIAL CASE. IF YOU HAD BEEN PRESENT AT THE SERMON ON THE MOUNT, YOU WOULD HAVE GAINSAID JESUS IN A NOTE TO HIM. YOU PROABLY WOULD HAVE ASKED HIM TO PASS IT ON TO GOD THE FATHER. THE VIRGIN MARY WOULD HAVE BEEN CC'D AS WOULD THE SHEPHERDS WHO CAME BY NIGHT TO SEE BABY JESUS. lee

From: John__D [mailto:noreply-comment@blogger.com]
Sent: Sunday, November 01, 2009 6:44 AM
To: tdecesar@tampabay.rr.com
Subject: [Lee Drury De Cesare's Casting-Room Couch] New comment on This Says It All with Addenda.

John__D has left a new comment on your post "This Says It All with Addenda":

Lee, how tiresome do you think some of your posts become? WHY DO YOU READ THEM, THEN? The your/you're cracks, the $340 per day/hour rot, I MADE A MISTAKE BACK WHEN THE ALAFIA FIASCO WAS GOING ON. I SHOULD HAVE STUCK WITH THE MISTAKE AND REFUSED TO BE CONVINCED OTHERWISE. I CAN DO SUCH DEEDS WITH A STRAIGHT FACE. IT RUNS OPPONENTS CRAZY. I DIDN' MAKE A MISTAKE ABOUT ELIA'S PLAN TO PAY $4500 EACH FOR SMITH AND HER VICE-PRINCIPAL TO GO TO ECKERD FOR A MIND ADJUSTMENT AT $4500 EACH. HAD THAT BEEN A TEACHER WHO FAILED TO GET ALONG WITH A WHOLE SCHOOL, HE OR SHE WOULD HAVE GOTTEN THE OLD PROFESSIONAL-STANDARDS GULAG HEAVE HO. the mullet hairdo insults, I LEARNE3D ABOUT MULLET HAIRDOS FROM MY READERS. I NOW HAVE A NEW INSULT IN MY ARSENA THANKS TO MY BLOG GANG. THE IMAGE MAKES ME LAUGH. I'M GLAD TO HAVE IT IN MY ARSENAL. and the same old "Earl the Pearl", I COUNT THIS ONE OF MY MORE INSPIRED LOCUTIONS. EARL THE PEARL AND OTHER ADMINISTRATORS AND SOME BOARD MEMBERS WERE ON THE TAKE IN THE ERWIN SCANDAL. ONLY AN IDIOT COULD NOT HAVE SEEN THAT. "Mileto the Munchkin" and "Pole-Girl Elia"NO, JENNIFER name-calling (satire?) READ THE GREATS OF SATIRE. NAME-CALLING IS A MAJOR TOOL IN THEIR KITS. wore WORN thin. I'm sick of reading about your shoes I AM NOT SICK OF MY SHOES. I LOVE THE DARLING THINGS. and how everyone who isn't a teacher is illiterate. SOME TEACHERS ARE ILLITERATE TOO. USUALLY THESE GRADUATED FROM THIRD-TIER COLLEGES. BUT TEACHERS HOLD UP THE WORLD OF LITERACY ON THEIR OVERWORKED SHOULDERS. You want to give a letter to the board outlining that a homeless person would be an improvement, THAT WAS NOT MY FORMULA: IT CAME FROM A READER. I THINK THE READER WAS INSPIRED. I THINK HE OR SHE WAS ON THE MONEY. yet you have slammed Home Ec degrees for months. TO A RADICAL FEMINIST SUCH AS I HAVE BEEN FOR 45 YEARS, THE DEGREE IS SEXIST. CAN ANYONE IMAGINE A WOMAN GETTING ON THE SUPREME COURT WITH A HOME-EC DEGREE? IT IS NOT A SUITABLE CREDENTIAL FOR A PERSON MAKING $150,000 A YEAR TO RULE ON THE BEHAVIOR OF TEACHERS AND TORTURE THEM WHEN POSSIBLE WITH THE PROSPECT OF LOSING THEIR JOBS FOR SOME MINOR OFFENSE, NOT ADMINISTRATORS, JUST TEACHERS GET PUNISHED BY THE PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS OFFICE. I ASKED AS PUBLIC INFORMATION FOR FILES ON ADMINISTRATORS PUNISHED: PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS HAD NONE.

I'm telling you that it becomes tiresome. This is fine if you keep it to your blog, but how tiresome do you think it becomes for those who receive your emails en masse? THEY ARE LUCKY DOGS. I SAY WHAT EVERYBODY KNOWS IS TRUE BUT WON'T UTTER IT, BECAUSE IF THEY DID THEY WOULD LOSE THEIR JOBS. Although it's your prerogative to write it on your blog, you seem to think it's okay to hassle everyone else with your tiresome unsolicited "satire". I ASSURE YOU THAT THE EMAILS SENT TO THE SCHOOL PEOPLE ARE DEVOURED BY THE RECIPIENTS. THEY ARE WHISPERED ABOUT IN OFFICES AND PASSED ALONG IN THE HALLS. THE FORTUNATE RECIPIEENTS KNOW WHAT I SAY IS TRUE, AND THE HONEST ONES SAY "THANK GOD" THAT SOMEONE IS SPEAKING THE TRUTH BECAUSE EVERYBODY ELSE IS SCARED TO LOSE THEIR JOBS. THEY COULD PUT A BLOCK SENDER ON ME IF THEY DID NOT WANT TO RECEIVE MY EMAILS.

Oh, I can knock off the back and forth "BACK-AND-FORTH" SHOULD GET HYPHENS. with Vox easily. I would like nothing more than to have the original question answered (or even stony salience like I usually receive) rather than having profanities hurled at me. NOW YOU ARE BEING TWO-FACED. YOU ARE AN ADDICT OF POTTY LINQUISTICS. GOADER KICKED YOU OFF HIS BLOG FOR YOUR HABITUAL POTTY MOUTH. But if I hadn't stood up and told Vox where to go right back at her, I don't think you would have said a word. BINGO. YOU ARE RIGHT. I AM FOND OF VOX EVEN WITH HER EXCESSES AND PARANOIA. SHE MAKES ME LAUGH. AND SHE KNOWS SO MANY HIDDEN TRUTHS ABOUT THE BAY AREA. IF SHE IS AFTER SOMETHING, SHE LEAVES NO STONE UNTURNED TO TRACK IT DOWN. LOOK HOW MUCH RESEARCH SHE DID RECENTLY TO FIND THE FBI RULES. I WOULDN'T HAVE THAT ZEAL, AND I AM A PRETTY GOOD RESEARCHER MYSELF. VOX IS THE BEST.

Meanwhile, I get told I'm un-American and unconstitutional. THAT'S BETTER THAN BEING CALLED BATHROOM EPITHETS. Perhaps if you'd told Vox to lay off in the first place, much of the back and forth could have been avoided. I DOUBT IT. YOU WOULD HAVE PICKED AT HER NO MATTER WHAT. NOW I AM PONDERING WHETHER TO KICK YOU OFF MY BLOG LIKE GOADER DID. I CAN'T FOR THE LIFE OF ME UNDERSTAND WHY YOU BOTHER WITH A BLOG WHICH YOU FIND SO OFFENSIVE TO YOUR SENSIBILITIES. DO YOU JUST GO WHRE YOU GET ATTENTION, OR DO YOU REALLY HAVE ETHICAL PROBLEMS WITH WHAT MY BLOG SPONSORS: FAIRNESS TO THE ABUSED TEACHERS OF THE COUNTY'S SCHOOLS AND CONTEMPT FOR THE BOARD AND ADMINISTRATION THAT ABUSES THEM?

I WILL HATE TO KICK YOU OFF BE4CAUSE THAT GOES AGAINST MY FREE-SPEECH CONVICTIONS. BUT IT MAY HAVE COME TOP THAT, JOHN. MAKE A CASE FOR MY KEEPING YOU AS A CONTRIBUTOR IF YOU CAN, GIVEN THE PURPOSE OF MY BLOG. YOU HAVE OTHER OUTLETS FOR YOUR VITRIOL; MINE IS NOT THE ONLY BLOG ON THE WEB. I WANT TO BE FAIR TO A READER AND CONTRIBUTOR, BUT I THINK YOU ARE A SPECIAL CASE.

Had YOU BEEN PRESENT AT THE SERMON ON THE MOUNT, YOU WOULD HAVE GAINSAID JESUS IN A PAPYRUS NOTE TO HIM. YOU PROBABLY WOULD HAVE ASKED HIM TO PASS IT ON TO GOD THE FATHER, WHO YOU WOULD HAVE POINTED OUT, HAS MADE A TON OF MISTAKES IN CREATING THE WORLD THAT HE COULD HAVE GOT RIGHT HAD HE CONSULTED YOU. YOU WOULD HAVE CC 'S THE VIRGIN MARY EVEN THOUGH THE NEW MOTHER WAS BUSY TRYING TO NURSE BABY JESUS AS WOULD THE SHEPHERDS CROWDED AROUND. THAT MUST HAVE BEEN AWKWARD FOR THE BLESSED VIRGIN. THOSE SHEPHERDS, POOR BELIEF-STARVED FELLOWS, HAD COME BY NIGHT, TROOPING MANY MILES TO SEE BABY JESUS AND WERE HAVING A HECK OF A TIME FINDING SOMEPLACE TO BOARD THEIR ANIMALS NEAR THE MANGER. lee