I'm happy to send you the original and revised copies. Your reader, who obviously doesn't know what he is talking about, could request copies in order to be fully informed and avoid further libelous charges against me. The sheriff's report and professional standards reports are 2 completely different things. I have never said the sheriff's report didn't say there were some indications. In fact, last time I wrote to you I clearly stated that it did say there were some indicators of abuse, neglect, or abandonment. Please set Mr. Anonymous straight. I'll forward all of it to you on Tuesday.
Date: Sat, 05 Sep 2009 21:37:45 -0400
Subject: FW: [Lee Drury De Cesare's Casting-Room Couch] New comment on Filling in the Piec
I agree with the reader who observed that Tom Gonzalez got his job as reward for the Erwin case. I further suspect that old rascal Crosby Few passed him the case for that very purpose.
That's the way the good ol' boy network gets all the goodies.
Gonzalez lost the case. Go figure. lee
Linda, I have had help from a reader on the redaction. I am going to have to ponder this further.
Is there a totally new version that the schools published with their name at the top of the child-abuse original document in the toecracker case?
I would be interested to see the two side by side: the original and the redaction. So please send me the redacted document and the original.
I wrote to the sheriff and complained about this situation. I think he would like to see the two documents and compare them too. I shall send him copies when you send mine to me. I have been in communication with the sheriff on this matter.
Tom Gonzalez seemed awfully wroth at my use of the word "redaction." I couldn't tell if that were his real response or just legal theater. ldd
From: Anonymous [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
Sent: Saturday, September 05, 2009 7:34 PM
Subject: [Lee Drury De Cesare's Casting-Room Couch] New comment on Filling in the Pieces of the Puzzle; You Ask Ques....
Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "Filling in the Pieces of the Puzzle; You Ask Ques...":
Linda Cobbe is working with the district to cover up the changing of the document by Professional Standards. The original report by a Child Protective Investigator did say there were indicators of abuse and Professional Standards then took that and typed up the same thing but then after Tom Gonzalez lied, Professional Standards typed up a new "corrected" copy of the Professional Standards report of the same case. It changed it so that there were "no indicators of abuse"....this was reported in the St. Pete Times with links to the original documents, and Linda Cobbe is playing hanky panky with your mind. She knows what you mean. The general gist of what you are saying is correct, although the exact details of your version are wrong. Professional Standards should not be able to change the report it made about the case and lie about the CPI's findings in a "corrected" version. These people are criminals.
Publish this comment.
Reject this comment.
Moderate comments for this blog.
Posted by Anonymous to Lee Drury De Cesare's Casting-Room Couch at 4:34 PM