Homewrecker Falliero's Newest Publicity Shot for Her Re-election to the School Board Campaign: Just the Kind of Board Member to Do the Right Thing for Students When She Is Not Doing the Wrong Thing for Les Gentilehommes
The Sheriff Is a Disco Customer at Joe Redner's Emporium of Love. Who Would Have Thought?
I'm happy to send you the original and revised copies. Your reader, who obviously doesn't know what he is talking about, could request copies in order to be fully informed and avoid further libelous charges against me. The sheriff's report and professional standards reports are 2 completely different things. I have never said the sheriff's report didn't say there were some indications. In fact, last time I wrote to you I clearly stated that it did say there were some indicators of abuse, neglect, or abandonment. Please set Mr. Anonymous straight. I'll forward all of it to you on Tuesday.
Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device
From: "lee"
Date: Sat, 05 Sep 2009 21:37:45 -0400
To:
Subject: FW: [Lee Drury De Cesare's Casting-Room Couch] New comment on Filling in the Piec
Sent: Saturday, September 05, 2009 7:34 PM
Subject: [Lee Drury De Cesare's Casting-Room Couch] New comment on Filling in the Pieces of the Puzzle; You Ask Ques....
Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "Filling in the Pieces of the Puzzle; You Ask Ques...":
Linda Cobbe is working with the district to cover up the changing of the document by Professional Standards. The original report by a Child Protective Investigator did say there were indicators of abuse and Professional Standards then took that and typed up the same thing but then after Tom Gonzalez lied, Professional Standards typed up a new "corrected" copy of the Professional Standards report of the same case. It changed it so that there were "no indicators of abuse"....this was reported in the St. Pete Times with links to the original documents, and Linda Cobbe is playing hanky panky with your mind. She knows what you mean. The general gist of what you are saying is correct, although the exact details of your version are wrong. Professional Standards should not be able to change the report it made about the case and lie about the CPI's findings in a "corrected" version. These people are criminals.
Publish this comment.
Reject this comment.
Folks, be patient. I am writing to Bill and Melinda about the grant. It will be in the board's computer mail by Monday. I don't think most of them know how to turn on a computer yet.
I agree with the reader who observed that Tom Gonzalez got his job as reward for the Erwin case. I further suspect that old rascal Crosby Few passed him the case for that very purpose.
That's the way the good ol' boy network gets all the goodies.
Gonzalez lost the case. Go figure. lee
Linda, I have had help from a reader on the redaction. I am going to have to ponder this further.
Is there a totally new version that the schools published with their name at the top of the child-abuse original document in the toecracker case?
I would be interested to see the two side by side: the original and the redaction. So please send me the redacted document and the original.
I wrote to the sheriff and complained about this situation. I think he would like to see the two documents and compare them too. I shall send him copies when you send mine to me. I have been in communication with the sheriff on this matter.
Tom Gonzalez seemed awfully wroth at my use of the word "redaction." I couldn't tell if that were his real response or just legal theater. ldd
-----Original Message-----
From: Anonymous [mailto:noreply-comment@blogger.com]
Sent: Saturday, September 05, 2009 7:34 PM
To: tdecesar@tampabay.rr.com
Subject: [Lee Drury De Cesare's Casting-Room Couch] New comment on Filling in the Pieces of the Puzzle; You Ask Ques....
Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "Filling in the Pieces of the Puzzle; You Ask Ques...":
Linda Cobbe is working with the district to cover up the changing of the document by Professional Standards. The original report by a Child Protective Investigator did say there were indicators of abuse and Professional Standards then took that and typed up the same thing but then after Tom Gonzalez lied, Professional Standards typed up a new "corrected" copy of the Professional Standards report of the same case. It changed it so that there were "no indicators of abuse"....this was reported in the St. Pete Times with links to the original documents, and Linda Cobbe is playing hanky panky with your mind. She knows what you mean. The general gist of what you are saying is correct, although the exact details of your version are wrong. Professional Standards should not be able to change the report it made about the case and lie about the CPI's findings in a "corrected" version. These people are criminals.
Publish this comment.
Reject this comment.
Moderate comments for this blog.
Posted by Anonymous to Lee Drury De Cesare's Casting-Room Couch at 4:34 PM
12 comments:
The idiot lawyer loses lots of cases and throws tantrums.
But he tortured Erwin whom everyone thinks was an honorable man. Go into any school, and you will hear people say what a good man he was.
The school board was so angry at getting bad press from Erwin's allegations that they fell in love with Tom Gonzalez because he harmed Erwin so well like the evil person he is.
ask who initialed the two different professional standards reports.
look at the two professional standard reports and they look like the same letters, but not done by the same person.
maybe it doesn't matter since they are just initials, but just who did them?
Tom Gonzalez probably has all the illegal goods on the district, so they keep him on despite incompetence. They don't want him to expose them all out of revenge.
Testy, testy Cobbe! If you didn't work for such criminals you wouldn't have to be so defensive!
Mr. Anonymous specifically states that the CPI report is different than the two Professional Standards reports.
Mr. Anonymous said that there was a CPI report from the sheriff stating "some indicators."
Prof. Standards took that report, read it and typed up its own report to close the case saying there were "some indicators."
After Gonzalez either lied or made a mistake, Prof. Standards took its final report and submitted a new "corrected" copy saying "no indicators"
However, the St. Pete Times said that Linda Cobbe let them know that the sheriff's department did not send any new information, so there was no reason to submit a new "corrected" copy of the report the way Professional Standards did. This means Professional Standards can change its version of events after the fact whenever it wants apparently.
This was all reported in the Gradebook on the St. Pete Times education blog.
There is absolutely no reason for Prof. Standards to submit a new "corrected" copy that changes "some indicators" to "no indicators" the way it did. Cobbe is harping on little semantics.
Prof. Standards did not change the sheriff's report. It read the sheriff's report and typed up its own report for its files and typed what the sheriff's report said. Then, after Gonzalez misspoke, Prof. Standards pulled out its own report and "corrected" it so that Gonzalez did not look like a liar.
Cobbe is trying to run circles around you. Don't let her. The gist of what you have been saying is basically correct, but it is a semantic game they are playing with you. No, they didn't actually take the sheriff's report and change it. They didn't take a red pen and cross out what the sheriff's report says. But they did type up their own and then changed or corrected their own. Same basic thing. They are lying all the same.
dear lee, am I paying for linda to blackberry you bullshit while small school children get punched in the face at the busstop and then have to BUY THEIR OWN PRIVATE BUS RIDES TO SCHOOL?? AT ONE HUNDRED FORTY DOLLARS A MONTH CURRENTLY.
Tell Linda to use her blackberry time to ummmm counsel the inept and overeating board and admin that if they put a bus schedule in place and then endanger CHILDREN under a florida statute that FORCES a child into a school corrupt system that they are all liable for endangering children who are forced to wait at the busstop FOR HOURS WITH THUGS that mary ellen ELIA brought with her from the GD bronx.
Vox, you write shit.
But meanwhile, Vox, Linda Cobbe whines about being libeled. When she is retired and old she will have lots of regrets about defending criminals and unethical people for a paycheck. Of course, that is only if she has a heart.
But meanwhile, Vox, Linda Cobbe whines about being libeled. When she is retired and old she will have lots of regrets about defending criminals and unethical people for a paycheck. Of course, that is only if she has a heart.
these people are barely above, perhaps in step with and likely LOWER than murderers in some cases.
Too many mob wives in the school system. TOO MANY.
anonymous numnber one. you remember what I told you about S'ing TFU.
you read my shit. What's that make YOU, baby?
WHO is libeling linda cobbe?
I would like to meet them. We could get together and write a freaking libel bible on her.
please note that is just a joke. LIBEL is lies and mistruths. If you can prove something you can publish it on a TV SCREEN and not be libelous. If it's true .. it ain't libel.
Linda MAY NOT use the libel card.
WHAT is she saying isn't true? Can she prove it?
mwah.
Maybe tom gonzalez will help her.
LOL.
PeelaSleeve http://motrin.wikidot.com http://buy-erectalis.wikidot.com http://buy-eriacta.wikidot.com PeelaSleeve
Post a Comment