Tom, when I said at the January 15th board meeting that I would ask the federal government for a compliance review if the board did not stop allowing Elia to indulge in crony hiring and not advertising jobs so that all qualified people could apply, especially for the bloated-salary administrative appointments, you said I was dead wrong about the compliance requirements on federal funds and implied that my so saying made me a candidate for an extortion law suit against me for mentioning a compliance review in my appearance before the board.
I think you used this same logic when you advised what to do in the Erwin whistle-blower debacle--either you or one of your company's team. You were wrong then; I believe that you are wrong now. Thank God these framers of the equal-opportunity wrote these laws in such simple language that ordinary citizens such as I can understand the language.
You say you have been on the board only three years, but my information is that your company has held the exclusive right to the board attorney for fourteen years and that no other law firm was allowed to apply for the job. If you send me the public information about your relationship with the board that I asked for two months ago--and asked the board to tell you to provide me--then I can determine how long you have indeed had the job.
The information below is the same that I used at HCC to encourage non-discrimination. I infer if a contractor has any federal money at all that contractor is liable to federal non-discrimination provisions in employment and that Ms. Elia's with the board's approval hiring of her cronies or sycophants into jobs in administration for which they are not qualified and which the board has not advertised violates the federal non-discrimination provisions.
I infer if a contractor--such as the Hillsborough County school board--does not practice equal opportunity in hiring that a citizen such as I can ask for a compliance review from the federal government of the contractor's practices to ensure that these are coincident with the equal-employment-opportunity executive order.
I am aware that my inference will earn me another threat from you of my committing extortion for asking that the school board of Hillsborough County carry out the federal laws, for which board you are attorney, but I am willing to take the risk and to spend the rest of my life in the pokey in the name of equal opportunity, my incarceration's being attenuated by my hanging Prisella curtains in my cell, needlepointing wedding rugs for my granddaughters to wile away the hours, and making buddies of all the guards so that we can gossip about the vagaries of prison life.
May your house be safe from tigers as people say in India both in and out of jail.
Your pal, the extortion kid,
lee
Employment Standards Administration | | |
Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs |
| www.dol.gov/esa | | |
|
Find It!: By Topic | By Audience | By Top 20 Requested Items | By Form | By Organization | By Location |
| | |
1 comment:
Even if the school board is allowed to hand out no bid contracts as the attorney says, is it really the ethical, fair, and right thing to do? His argument is that they do not have to advertise or allow bidding on contracts. Well, taxpayers would like to make sure that they get the cheapest and best contract, so the school board should ethically bid everything out. Better yet, they should hire people who know what they are doing, so they don't have to hire experts to do their jobs for them!
Post a Comment