Tuesday, July 28, 2009

Adolescent Poltroon Attacks the Potency of the Husband of a Granny of Ten

Response to Too-Gutless-to-Sign-His-Name Below:

Since when does a 77-year old man need to certify his potency status, Sugarbritches? Don't you know a thing about anatomy and physiology? Probably not.

I am sure you thought the toe-cracking inflicted on male students by the psychosexually aberrant administrator was innocuous. You are doubtless a flatliner as well.

Accept my condolences.

Stupidity is always sad. So is gutlessness that keeps a creepette from signing his name. I predict you will be on IV Viagra by the time you become 21. I understand that you are now thirteen. This information will appear in powder-room posts across the country along with the prediction of your succumbing to ejaculatio praecox post puberty, poor boy. I wish you all the luck in the world with the amused sisterhood. They are not kind to fellows with your incipient disabilities.

Use a comma after "Lee" for direct address. And clean your fingernails.

lee drury de cesare

-----Original Message-----
From: Evil Through [mailto:evilthroughandthrough@gmail.com]

Sent: Saturday, July 25, 2009 1:29 PM
To: tdecesar@tampabay.rr.com
Subject: Re: c to all members of the HC school board and administration

Lee Darling, I'm so sorry to learn of your husbands impotence. Although, given his situation, I can understand the cause of his condition. I wish him all the luck in the world. He needs it.

Mr. Hegarty:

My husband cut out the 7/27 article "Barefoot Penalty Draws Scrutiny" on the activities of the foot-fetishist assistant principal Guy Olayinka, Hillsborough County Schools.

You pooh-poohed its significance to the press despite foot fetishism's having long history in the annals of psychological pathology about which professional educators should know, Your response to the press illustrated either your ignorance of an area in which you should be knowledgeable or your complicity in the administration's and the board's tolerating administrative pathological behavior involving students. Had this been a teacher playing with students' toes, the board would have fired him or her on the spot.

Did the school board have a psychological examination of foot-fetishist Olayinka before issuing its public stance of "his actions are harmless"? Evidently not. This situation illustrates why the ROSSAC know-nothings need degrees of more sophistication than home ec and early childhood.

A teacher called me about this problem about two months ago. A parent had complained to him about Olayinka's odd fetish. I told him to take it to Secretary of Education Smith because the local school board has a default policy of never punishing administrative employee, no matter how vile the offense. Board members collude in this cover-up of an administrative person's bizarre derelictions or any other dereliction to the detriment of the students who are victims of such a weird administrative obsessions as foot fetishism. The board does not protect students by pretending its members do not know what is going on. Its members come off as stupid and indifferent to administrative misbehavior.

c: all board members
Superintendent Elia

[ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foot_fetishism#cite_ref-3 ]^ Scorolli C, Ghirlanda S, Enquist M, Zattoni S, Jannini E A (2007). Relative prevalence of different fetishes. International Journal of Impotence Researchadvance online publication 15 February 2007; doi: 10.1038/sj.ijir.3901547. [ http://www.nature.com/ijir/journal/v19/n4/abs/3901547a.html ]http://www.nature.com/ijir/journal/v19/n4/abs/3901547a.html retrieved March 2007.

[ http://www.who.int/classifications/apps/icd/icd10online/ ]World Health Organization, International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, (2007), Chapter V, F65 Disorders of sexual preference.

Lee Drury DeCesare\15316 Gulf Boulevard 802/Madeira Beach, FL /leedrurydecesarescasting-roomcouchblogspot.com


Anonymous said...

The idiot who attacked your husband (attacked someone who has done nothing to him) had to resort to ad hominem attacks because he has nothing to argue or defend the board's criminal behavior that you expose constantly.

Vox Populi said...

you got that right, anonymous. What a loser that must be.
As to the toe-cracker. OH MY GOD could it GET sicker/ yes, well it could but not by much. Next year he will have his own school. If he had ever done that to anyone in my family I'm afraid that he would be enjoying toes in several orifices .....

John__D said...

Steady on Anon. Lee has attacked plenty of people about their illiteracy, and those people had done nothing to her.

Please explain the difference.

John__D said...

Here's the missing comma of direct address. This blog does not allow editing.


Vox Populi said...

john d is not tracable to a blog though he pretends to have one. Lee if you ever critiqued my grammar and punctuation I would take it as a wonderful lesson I couldn't get anywhere else. I hope you don't, however. LOL.
John D just for the record, I believe that Lee is wielding the sword of intellect. Which is perfcectly acceptable because the discussion, AFTER ALL, is education.
So, it's okay for my grammar and punctuation to be iffy. BUT I don't advertise myself as an educational paragon of virtue and 'doing stuff for the chirrun' with stuffings for brains as these school employed folks do.
That's the difference there, bucko.
Never come to a battle of the wits unarmed.