Friday, May 23, 2008

Superintendent Round-up














Another
squawk from Mr. Bernard:

From: Anonymous[noreply-comment@blogger.com]

Sent: Sunday, May 25, 2008 1:31 AM

To: tdecesar@tampabay.rr.com

Subject: [Lee Drury De Cesare's Casting-Room Couch] New comment on Superintendent Round-up.

Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "Superintendent Round-up":

Response to what, my friend and future admirer? I have so many quarrels with the board that you must be specific.

At your post here, you published Tom Gonzalez's letter.

Gonzalez thinks that you wrote this:

“The School Board had 10 days over the usual 20 to answer the complaint. The School Board failed to do so.” The woman who filed the charge, Ms. Satchell, gave me the impression that Gonzalez had missed the school-board filing time. I thought she had followed the issue closely and knew the score. But what if I did mix up the filing times? That's nothing to fulminate about as you are doing.

I suspect you have some hidden agenda like sexism: not thinking it's ok for a woman to speak out. Or you have some buddies in the administration and think it's ok for it to run ROSSAC like a crony jobs program for family and sycophants.

Gonzalez writes this:


Although I believe the order to be self-explanatory, I note that on April 28, 2008, Judge Arnold allowed the School Board and the individual defendants additional time within which to respond to Ms. Satchel’s complaint. Therefore, neither the School Board nor either of the other defendant -i (sic) (cunieform?)required to file a response to the suit until Tuesday, May 6, 2008.

I refer to this response. Is it true that Gonzalez provided the document? Does it outline what he says it does? I think you knew what I was referring to. If you've got the guts, respond.

Gonzalez provided me no document about the filing. And it takes no guts to merely tell the facts. Courage has to do with acting in a difficult decision to do the right thing. This is not one of those cases. It's simply a question about a clerical detail by a fellow--you-- whose head is filled with tremendous trifles.


All your talk of guts makes me laugh. When I do provide my name, you question it and then make fun of it (although the breed is a St Bernard). You must have been a great teacher and role model.

My nursing patients used to call me "Ms. Dreary," because my maiden name was
Drury. I laughed. I didn't attach undue significance to the situation. You seem to be the kind of fellow who strains at gnats. You have my condolences, Mr. Whatever.

I was a competent teacher most days and an inspired one occasionally. And I did inspire a number of students. The best student evaluation I got in 28 years was "off the wall but knows her stuff." And I was a role model for a number of students. Most teachers are.

Your obsessions are trivial. I am an intellectual. Give me something tough to answer or hush up.

If you have a big crush on Gonzalez, write him a billet doux. He might like to receive one. lee
drury de cesare

Publish this comment.

Reject this comment.

Moderate comments for this blog. There are a couple of nay-sayers in the comments cul-de-sac. Here's one who is arguing that Ms. Elia does not need any experience such as being principal before she becomes superintendent. Somebody answer this logician of the last resort. I have to deal with a specimen who calls my satire a pack of lies. lee
Anonymous Anonymous said...

So you would agree that every US general must have slung hash in an army kitchen? That the head of Fed Ex must have experience as a motor mechanic? That Bill Gates has experience cleaning the toilets at Microsoft?

5:52 AM

From: Anonymous [mailto:noreply-comment@blogger.com]
Sent: Saturday, May 24, 2008 9:40 AM
To: tdecesar@tampabay.rr.com
Subject: [Lee Drury De Cesare's Casting-Room Couch] New comment on LAW OFFICES THOMPSON, SIZEMORE, GONZALEZ & HEARIN....

Anonymous has left a new comment on your post " LAW OFFICES THOMPSON, SIZEMORE, GONZALEZ & HEARIN...":

You are obsessed with the provision of names, but only from someone who disagrees with you. Interesting.
This is my blog, sugarbritches. I can be as picky as I want to be. I demand the names of any person I choose if the antic mood descends upon me, and the antic mood is usually upon me. It's the only mood in which one has any fun.

My name is Paul Barnard.

Is this a nom de plume? And is the last name kin to those wonderful dogs who carry water around their necks to people stuck in the tundra?

Now, why are you bringing up Gonzalez's lies as a distraction? Is this a technique you use regularly to cover your own lies?
Can you think of a better one? If so, share it, and I will put it to work.

Did Gonzalez really provide you with a document that showed that the Board had more time to file a response than you maintained?

Response to what, my friend and future admirer? I have so many quarrels with the board that you must be specific.


Have the guts to provide a response. ;)

I have done so. If it doesn't suit you, meet me in the ROSSAC parking lot for a shootout. Weapons are either pistols or feather dusters. I advise you to pick pistols. I am lethal with feather dusters.

What does the cunieform or Romper Room squiqqle mean at the end of the entry? I know only English, French, Italian, and pig Latin. Now's the time to go learned on me to show off your erudition.

love and kisses-

lee

Paul Barnard

Publish this comment.

Reject this comment.

Moderate comments for this blog.


Posted by Anonymous to Lee Drury De Cesare's Casting-Room Couch at 6:39 AM

Delete
Well, it looks like Mr. Grego will get the job of superintendent in Osceola County. He and Elia were the two last standing in Hillsborough County superintendent lottery. The board had not selected anybody outside the county since 1967. They dredged up Dr. Lennard from the bowels of vo-tech.

The board advertised "nationwide" for a superintendent at the cost of $35,000 to the taxpayers when its members knew all the time that the ad was a cover-their-hind-quarters gesture. But taxpayer money was well spent, they figure, on covering their backsides.

The only current board member who did not participate in this
fakery was April Griffin, not on the board then--not that she wouldn't have fallen in line if we can judge from her subsequent performance on the board.

Elia's experience was minimal--and all in the
HC school system. The board took umbrage at a well-qualified candidate who, they said, was hoity-toity. The woman had excellent credentials and the assurance that go with those. This board is so parochial that anybody with academic pizzazz cows them. A students intimidate them. They want a C student, and they got it in Elia.

My read is they since the board was scared of anybody with ability, Elia with her meagre credentials,
HC-only experience, and no Ph.D. (the board lowered the PH.D. requirement to Elia's master's) suited the board just fine. My read is that a person with ability threatens the board C students, so Elia, who has to struggle with grammar and punctuation and who probably flattered the imminently susceptible board members to a faretheewell from her in-house spot got the job. Since then, Otero has acted her faithful lieutenant in the weird protocols of the secondary school system administrations.

A teacher told me at the protest of the extra class to the board that
Otero would have been worse than Elia. I wonder if that teacher would have said that after Elia left her goody campaign mode and morphed into Madame Chiang Kai Chek with the extra class, the grade inflation scheme, and the Spring, avoiding teacher input in all three unilateral decisions.

I got these data from the
St. Pete Times's Mr. Solochek. He never says anything spicy or reveals anything about the underbelly of school politics, the reason why newspapers are bleeding ad revenue apace and giving way to the blogs, but he has the facts right.

The Osceola board is all men. That fact may give Le
Otero agita sooner or later. You know how competitive men are. This will probably be another Freudian Totem and Taboo primal horde choreograph. The bottom line is that Otero should guard his goodies in Osceola: that 's Indian country. Think General Custer. lee

May 20, 2008

Wait continues for superintendent hopeful

<span class=Hillsborough assistant superintendent Mike Grego was a finalist Tuesday for the top job in Osceola County. But the School Board put off a final vote for two weeks.

Three of the Osceola Board members have stated that they favor Grego for their next superintendent. The other two prefer Alberto Carvalho, an associate superintendent from Miami-Dade. That didn't seem to change on Tuesday, according to Osceola schools spokeswoman Dana Schafer. But a Carvalho supporter presented new data about student performance from both candidates' home districts.

Since the information had not been vetted, a decision was tabled until June 4 to allow Board members time to further interview the candidates, Schafer said. "This is the most important decision they have to make," she added. "It's a two-week wait to say are you comfortable with your decision."

Grego, 50, was one of two finalists for Hillsborough superintendent three years ago and has expressed interest in the open job in Pinellas schools.





Hillsborough names new school chief

The Hillsborough School Board voted unanimously to name facilities chief MaryEllen Elia the district's first female superintendent.

By JEFFREY S. SOLOCHEK
Published May 19, 2005


TAMPA - Hillsborough School Board members stuck with the familiar Thursday, choosing facilities chief MaryEllen Elia to be the first female superintendent of the nation's ninth-largest school district.

Elia, who has never been a principal or superintendent, immediately set an ambitious agenda that keyed into the board's top goals. She pledged to redouble efforts to eliminate the achievement gap and to take every possible step to meet the incessant growth that fills schools faster than the district can build them.

"The board had some excellent candidates," said Elia, 56, who won a unanimous vote on the first ballot. "The issues that I think are most important right now - the issues of student achievement and growth - are issues that I've had experience with."

Before taking over the construction and maintenance department in 2003, Elia led the district's secondary education division. She also created a widely acclaimed magnet school system.

Board members credited Elia, a 19-year district veteran, with developing relationships with other government entities.

"This wasn't because she was a woman, though I think a woman's perspective is a value," said Candy Olson, chair of the six-woman, one-man board. "This person is the best person. The relationships she's built over years with all levels of people in our community, that speaks for itself."

Rumors have swirled for months that the fix was in for an insider. Earlier in the week, board member Jennifer Faliero pointedly asked Hillsborough assistant superintendent Michael Grego, another finalist, whether he was the "chosen one" to replace retiring schools chief Earl Lennard.

He said no.

Elia, meanwhile, deflected questions about whether she benefited from a "good old boy" system.

"I am the antithesis of the good old boy system," she said.

The board needed little time Thursday to pare the five-candidate field to Elia and Grego.

Detroit schools CEO Kenneth Burnley withdrew his name moments before the board convened. Miami-Dade deputy superintendent Sonia Diaz impressed board members with her knowledge, but apparently rubbed some the wrong way with what were deemed "prima donna" traits.

Former New Orleans superintendent Anthony Amato did not get enough votes to move ahead.

Elia and Grego sat tensely in their usual meeting chairs, hands folded, as board members began to discuss their preferences. When vice chairwoman Carolyn Bricklemyer joined the chorus leaning toward a candidate with experience in construction and instruction, Elia gave up trying to not smile.

Grego sank into his chair. He later congratulated Elia and offered his support.

Board members expressed no concern that they ran a national search that ended with a leader they've known for years. The district has not hired an outsider as superintendent since 1967.

See tomorrow's Times or sptimes.com for the full report.

[Last modified May 19, 2005, 17:45:03]

20 comments:

Anonymous said...

The article from Solochek says, "Elia, who has never been a principal or superintendent...."

That is very important. She oversees principals and needs to have walked in their shoes before making decisions that impact schools.

Anonymous said...

So you would agree that every US general must have slung hash in an army kitchen? That the head of Fed Ex must have experience as a motor mechanic? That Bill Gates has experience cleaning the toilets at Microsoft?

Fred said...

Lee, whatever happened with your meeting with Steven Gorham? I thought for sure you'd tell us if he should get our vote.

twinkobie said...

Meeting with Gorham: I think he is promising and would be a good substitute for Kurdell. Almost anyone not a rubberstamp is an acceptable substitute. He is sophisticated about the district's problems. He has a teacher wife, which explains that fact to me. He says he can face down Elia. That would be novel and welcome. He is fluent about the problems of the schools, is nice looking, and a good listener. I gave him a hundred bucks. There is another guy in the race now. We must look at him too. lee

Anonymous said...

Response to what, my friend and future admirer? I have so many quarrels with the board that you must be specific.

At your post here, you published Tom Gonzalez's letter.

Gonzalez thinks that you wrote this:

“The School Board had 10 days over the usual 20 to answer the complaint. The School Board failed to do so.”

Gonzalez writes this:


Although I believe the order to be self-explanatory, I note that on April 28, 2008, Judge Arnold allowed the School Board and the individual defendants additional time within which to respond to Ms. Satchel’s complaint. Therefore, neither the School Board nor either of the other defendant -i (sic) (cunieform?)required to file a response to the suit until Tuesday, May 6, 2008.

I refer to this response. Is it true that Gonzalez provided the document? Does it outline what he says it does? I think you knew what I was referring to. If you've got the guts, respond.

All your talk of guts makes me laugh. When I do provide my name, you question it and then make fun of it (although the breed is a St Bernard). You must have been a great teacher and role model.

Anonymous said...

No, no ... you're right. A superintendent should have experience as a principal, having walked in their shoes before making decisions that affect them.

After all, every principal has walked in the shoes of math teachers, English teachers, science teachers, physics teachers, chemistry teachers, history teachers, geography teachers, wood and metal class teachers, gym teachers, music teachers, kindergarten teachers, after-school care teachers, and foreign language teachers before making a decision that would affect any of them.

I'm sure someone will set this poster straight.

Anonymous said...

It is illogical to compare a principal's job with slinging hash or cleaning toilets. I did not say that a Superintendent needs to have been a janitor or a cafeteria worker.

A principal hires people, manages an entire school, and hopefully deals with human beings compassionately, if she/he is a good principal. A principal has to make tough decisions about what unit to cut if she has to cut a unit which always effects students and also at least one person's job which can be very upsetting to that person. Even though some may disagree principals are the administrators who are in the trenches with the teachers. They know what is happening with their teachers and students and also know what decisions administration downtown are making.

Elia prances into principal meetings and tells principals what they need to be doing at their schools. That was my main point. How would she know what they should do? She's never done it! She probably could not run a school if she tried. The entire staff would hate her and transfer away. I find she has stepped on many, many toes on her way up the ladder. She thinks she knows best and thinks she knows everything. Being a principal may have weeded her out of a top administrative position, because I bet she would have failed miserably as a principal using the tactics she uses to manage human beings. And that would have nipped her career in the bud and spared us all.

Anonymous said...

I remember watching Elia's interview and praying that she would not get picked. Something about her "good ole boy" comment made me sick. She is awful. I did have a laugh when Bill O'Reilly on Fox said she should be removed (in re: to the Ragusa, LaFave problems.) Maybe a nice email to him might get more attention.

Anonymous said...

Do you have the details or a link to the Bill O'Reilly clip? I could not find it.

Anonymous said...

But what if I did mix up the filing times?

Well, you would have been spreading lies, as Gonzalez wrote.

If you want something tough to answer, Ms Intellectual, here it is - Was Gonzalez correct in saying that you had published lies about him?

If you think it's trifling, that's your prerogative. Your readers may, however, think that if you could lie about that, you could also lie about the document that Gonzalez said he included. Only you and Gonzalez really know, but it seems strange that he mentioned it, listed it as an enclosure, and then forgot to put it in the envelope.

Anonymous said...

Sorry - forgot to sign my name.

Paul Barnard

Anonymous said...

I wonder who this Paul Bernard is. He seems to brown nose the administration. Must be in administration.

Anonymous said...

And I wonder who you are, anonymous. (Did you know that Lee feels your words have more clout if you sign your name?) You don't know jack, you assume much, and you seem to have trouble copying my name, too.

What a shame that you can't vouch for the contents of that envelope (or thet FedEx box or whatever it was) to put my mind at ease and clear Lee's name.

Paul Barnard

Anonymous said...

I think Lee said the fed ex envelopes contained the letters from Tom Gonzalez sent to her that she posted to the blog. What else would they contain? Lee?

twinkobie said...

What else could the Fed x envelopes contain but Gonzalez's letters?

I think Le Bernard has gone round the bend. I may have to send to Chatahoochee for a camisole for him. lee

twinkobie said...

On second reading, I think it may be possible that Bernard is asking me if Gonzalez sent me a copy of the court statement which cited the filing times. No, he did not. He didn't want to waste any space that he could use to revile me. Reviling is Gonzalez's favorite thing to do. lee

Anonymous said...

Lee and Anonymous,

My goodness! If the school board carried on as you both do, you’d be squealing like wieners on a barbecue. I’ve been surprised that this has gone on for this long given that Lee has already posted the evidence on the internet.

Please go back and read this post here. (That’s a link; click on the word “here”.) Especially you, anonymous, because I reckon that you have (at most) a cursory glance at anything that isn’t one of Lee’s “satirical” jokes about potted-plant board members or other name-calling.

Tom Gonzalez’s letter isn’t the only thing that Lee has posted at the link above. Lee has scanned the order that Gonzalez said he included and that Lee alleged he didn’t. (It’s the first thing on the blog entry, which should make it easier to find.)

So, annoyingmous (you’re too gutless to provide your name for me to make fun of), the Fed Ex package could have included not only Gonzalez’s letters but also an enclosure viz. the court order granting an extension of time. More than could have – it did. Lee has repeatedly insisted that this order was not enclosed, yet somehow it ended up scanned and posted at the link I provide above (for the second time).

Now, please, Liar Drury De Ceitful, did Gonzalez provide the filing times court order that you say was never there, even though you somehow managed to scan it and post it to your blog? You wanted something tough to answer; here’s your chance. You have written that you have many grievances with the board and that it is hard to keep track of them all, so I hope I have spelled this one out sufficiently for you to comment.

Anonymous, do you have anything further to suggest how something that Lee said she didn’t receive ended up scanned and posted on her blog? I’d love to read it!

Satirize all that if you like, Lee, but please find the time and the guts to answer the question if you are as courageous as you write you are.

Signed with all my love and affection,

Paul Barnard

Anonymous said...

I am chiming in here. I think Lee wrote that she mixed up the times. I wonder why you are obsessing over this. No one cares about this issue. The bigger issues are more important than whether she mixed up the times or not, which she admits she did, I believe.

Anonymous said...

I don't know which anonymous you are, Chimer, but I'm guessing you are a new one. Leave your name next time, please.

Yes, Lee wrote that she mixed up the times. My main concern is that Lee writes:

"I have to deal with a specimen who calls my satire a pack of lies."

"Gonzalez provided me no document about the filing."

"I think it may be possible that Bernard is asking me if Gonzalez sent me a copy of the court statement which cited the filing times. No, he did not."

Gonzalez provided the document. Forget the alleged oh-so-innocent mixing up of times; I'm talking about her lying about receiving the document. If Lee could blatantly lie about that, people might believe she's capable of lying about other stuff, too. It might damage her credibility.

No one cares? Surely more people would care about someone lying on the internet and defaming someone than would care about Elia's punctuation and grammar on her job application. Many would argue that people think there are bigger issues than piddly punctuation errors. What do you say to those who obsess over a comma?

(Other anonymous: You've gone quiet! How did that document Lee didn't receive end up scanned and posted on her blog?)

Paul Barnard

Anonymous said...

[Pin drops.]

"The biggest lie has always been to keep quiet; and the best life-enhancer is to provoke, unsettle, rile – in short, to make people face the truth. Gore Vidal"

Paul Barnard