You will note also how deferential the interviewing team is to Hamilton. God forbid that its servile members interupt one of Hamilton's amour-propre sililoquies and get in a question relevant to the Erwin complaints. The explanation is that they are all ROSSAC drones.
Hamilton start nitpicking Erwin in catty asides and ended up in a murderous rage recommending that he be destroyed. I think what he is angry with Irwin because besides disturbing the ROSSAC equilibrium of robbing the public with bloated salaries for these pooh-bahs who are trying to eradicate Erwin and ubiquitous theft and graft for the lower-level thieves is that he must have heard Erwin discussed Hamilton's odd relationship with Connie The Munchkin Mileto, and it got back to Hamilton. These are not lovely people, are they? lee
50th reunion of the HHC Class of '51; I am complaining about not enough women in the Hall of Fame. I was booed. lee
Lee,
Read the passage below from Hamilton's interview. Employees have the same perception of Elia, yet they find it just dandy to ignore that, so why was Erwin crucified for this perception but Elia is not?
I believe that this passage proves that they played mind games on Erwin. They used this argument to try to shut him up.
And the conversations that both Dr. Lennard and I had with Mr. Erwin were to the point of, when it comes to perceptions, perceptions are what matters, and the employees believe that he was unfair, authoritarian, dictatorial, unreasonable, abusive or whatever. It really doesn’t matter what Mr. Erwins’ intentions were if that were the effects and what he was told was, that he needed to develop the kind of working rapport with his employees that were would be necessary to have an effective organization. And also told him that Mr. Newsome had the same kind of perceptual problems about Mr. Erwin.
No comments:
Post a Comment