From: lee decesare [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2007 10:19 PM
To: email@example.com; Candy Olson (firstname.lastname@example.org); edgecomb (email@example.com); faliero (firstname.lastname@example.org); Jack Lamb (Jack.Lamb@sdhc.k12.fl.us); Susan Valdes (email@example.com); 'firstname.lastname@example.org'
Cc: 'email@example.com'; 'firstname.lastname@example.org'; 'email@example.com'; 'Patrick Manteiga'; 'firstname.lastname@example.org'; 'Howardtroxler@sptimes.com'; 'email@example.com'; Dabonich@aol.com; Doug & Cathy SCW (firstname.lastname@example.org); Edith A Tobul (email@example.com); Frank Sanchez (firstname.lastname@example.org); KPerezhsb2004@aol.com (KPerezhsb2004@aol.com); Margie (email@example.com); rich (firstname.lastname@example.org); Stein (email@example.com); Tiger Bay Club of Tampa (firstname.lastname@example.org); Warren Rachels (WRACHELS@tampabay.rr.com)
Subject: monkey biz as usual
Subject: Board's and Administrators' Behaving Badly
c: Ignored , Abused, Put-upon Teachers
From: lee drury de cesare
Everyone must have seen the Lamb story in the metro section of today's Tribune.
That story gets this reaction from me:
The Press Is Waking Up to the Board's and Administration's Crass Treatment of Teachers
In last week's La Gaceta's "As We Heard It," must-read for Bay-area political people, Publisher Patrick Manteiga says this:
"Hillsborough County high-school teachers are upset because the school administration has not effectively communicated its new requirement to have them teach six of seven periods in the 2007-2008 school year instead of the five of seven they currently teach.
Rumors abound about the firings and assigning teachers to unfamiliar subjects. Teachers are angry, feeling they are being asked to work harder and longer without additional compensation.
All this to save $28 million by changing the day their day is structured.
Everyone says teachers are our greatest resource, but at times like this, they seem to have no advocates. he union, administration and even the parents remain quiet.
We risk losing some of these teachers, destroying their morale, and making them less effective in teaching our children. Are the savings worth it?"
As Robert Burns said, ""O' wad some pow'r the giftie gi'e us, tae see o'orsels as ithers see us." I translate for Board and administration reluctant scholars: "Oh, would some power the gift to give us to see ourselves as others see us."
Board members can't evade what teachers saw April 10th. They must depart the ROSSAC through-the-looking-glass world and enter the real world. This teacher blog, The Wall, with URL below contains revealing teachers' reactions to that turbulent meeting at which the Board sat bemused as teachers lectured them from the podium.
Since my children attended Grady, Coleman, and Plant, I have fought with and observed the Board for forty years. That experience gives me context.
What offended me most at the packed April 15th meeting in which democracy enjoyed rare display was the Board's contempt for the cafeteria worker. She spoke first in the citizens' hearing. The Board's indifference to this woman reminded me of Doug Erwin 's treatment some years back. He reported crooks in the building department, and the Board ignored Irwin and abandoned him to the sadism of the Earl-the-Pearl-Lennard administration. The record shows that the Board has always cooperated with the administration's skullduggery.
The Board signed off for the Lennard's administration's legal persecution of Erwin and for even the failed appeal of the court decision favoring Mr. Erwin. It underwrote punishment of this whistleblower with public funds and shielded the guilty administration, especially those who made Erwin's life miserable after he blew the whistle on corruption.
After pissing away a pile of tax money on legal bills and displaying its low ethics, the Board paid Erwin what the courts ordered.
Erwin declined to resume his job and retired, one infers, a disillusioned man.
Recently, the County gave Erwin an award for courage. He journeyed from retirement in Georgia to receive it. Not one Board member attended the ceremony. This vignette gives us insight into the the ethics of the School Board of Hillsborough County.
Dealing with the School Board is analogous to Siegfried and Roy's job. Remember what happened to Roy? A seven-year-old white tiger called Montecore grabbed him by the neck and dragged him off stage. It was nip and tuck for a while for dear mistaken Roy, incarcerated in the Intensive Care Unit.
Those big Board cats may look lovable and teachers may wish they were, but just get too near them and let down your guard, and you may replicate Roy's wake-up call.
Teachers forget this history at their peril. Thinking the Board will rescue teacher from Elia is sentimental skewed thinking. The teachers have to save themselves from a common opponent: the administration Board duo.
The Board-administration had put the cafeteria worker whom they ignored on leave for whistle-blowing unsanitary conditions at her place of work--including roach infestation. But it won't pay her the money it owes her, she said, a tough situation for a cafeteria worker for sure. As one watched, the Board members all acted as if this woman were a dehumanized bug herself when she stood at the podium pleading her case.
The quality of mercy is not strained; it droppeth from heaven like the gentle rain--but not from the gentle Board.
The cafeteria-worker tableaux laid bare the Board's indifference to anything but its own wellbeing, which includes indulging in the entres nous patter of the ROSSAC tribal pod that Board members become part of the minute they triumph in the voting booth. Pod members--Board and administration--have no empathy for those outside the pod.
All promises of keeping in touch with citizens, all pledges of revolutionizing the school system to include the whole school family, all avowals to guard every penny of taxpayer money get tossed into the slag heap of broken campaign promises as Board members enter ROSSAC Valhalla to rubberstamp administration fiats and bask in the limelight of public éclat. And, oh yes, go on jaunts at public expense: the Board gaggle is out in San Francisco this week on a putative national board conference. I'd like to give them a pop quiz on what they learned as they step off the plane.
Compared to Hillsborough County School Board members, Woton is a model of modesty.
The first courageous, non-Siegfred-and-Roy-cat Board member has yet to surface and show desire to hear from teachers. Board members are scared to depart the script for fear other Board members and administrators will freeze them out of gossip fests and deprive them of cupcakes at Board tea parties. Only a Board member with guts will move to give teachers a permanent slot on the Board agenda to protect themselves against future rip-offs. If the Board respects teachers in deed instead of hypocritical word, it will vote this teacher slot on the agenda. But teachers have to have the chutzpah to make them.
A vote on a teacher place at the table will tell all. The lights on the vote panels will target Board members who respect and who don't respect teachers. That list will comprise targets at Board members re-election time. It will give opponents a ready-made agenda on which to run against Board members who voted against hearing from teachers and ceding them their own space on the agenda.
Voters love teachers. They don't love administrators and Board members. The voting public that loves teachers won't take kindly to a member who votes against a slot for teachers on the Board agenda. If an opponent pounds that issue and teachers assist this opponent, I predict a rare incumbent ousting.
It's hard to pick a leader from the astute, articulate teachers who spoke April 10th because they all were leaders. Any one would make a fine head of a permanent teacher nucleus to take on the politics of opposition to Board and administration unfair treatment of teachers. A priority for this group should be to request of the Tribune and SPTimes an editorial-board interview at election time to give this on-the-ground teachers' views of the candidates. The same thing goes for my old boss of La Gaceta, Mr. Manteiga.
Real classroom teachers will get those interviews, I predict, which they need because the CTA staff has jumped into bed with the administration and doesn't represent teachers' best interests in its endorsement interviews and endorsements. Newspapers respect real teachers as does everyone.
The teacher corps can solicit views of every teacher in the system--God bless technology--and collate teacher priorities for the the editorial board.
And, of course, teachers will interview School Board candidates and issue real teachers' endorsements. Those will be the most sought-after endorsements in the County.
Prominent question to candidates should deal with Board member's conduct in this extra-class debacle that consigns teachers to work without pay compared to Board largesse in Elia's obscene salary, perquisites, and bonuses stolen from teachers' work. The Board rubberstamped stealing credit from teachers for gains teachers made in raising student scores and handing another $48,000 "bonus" to Elia for these gains, even though she is a poor model for students since she can't use commas with aplomb. Prominent in election dialogue with candidates should be Elia's bloated loot compared to teachers' meager salaries and heavy work loads.
Teachers can even ask for and get a guest slot at Tiger Bay to lay out their problems and their solutions to them, not the administration, not the rubber-stamp potted-plant Board. Tiger Bay can't turn down teachers. Nobody turns down teachers and survives to tell the tale.
Teachers rank conscientious and peaceful genus. The Tribune's Brown was right when she said so in the article below. But they must not shrink from confrontation and let these traits prevent their assessing Olson's-Edgecomb's "teachers behaving badly" slurs on the 10th. These were arrogant, ham-handed efforts to tap into teachers' automatic response to their "get- in-line-and-be-good" genes. What those two said translated into this:
- "Teachers, don't exercise your constitutional rights to free speech. Just give up and roll over and show your bellies. Classroom teachers, abandon your right to confront elected officials to express grievances. Teachers, surrender your wills and agree to be automatons on the ROSSAC plantation. Cooperate in performing your sole purpose, dictated from our privileged perch, which is to tote that barge and lift that bale. Your silent labor provides tax-kitty economic base for us nobs in the ROSSAC Big House to preen in public gatherings and enjoy faux reputations as elected humanitarians who care about education. In fact, we care only about the power, prestige, and community standing that a slot on the School Board gives us, and we Board Olympians are damned determined to hold on to incumbency by lying to teachers if needed."
Here's my data on Elia's looting of the tax kitty with Board collusion: her bloated salary, perquisites, and "bonus" stolen from teachers for student achievement that teachers effected:
- a. Salary: $262,000; b. perquisites: God knows what the bill is for pricey trips, "conferences," luxury hoedowns peripheral to education, etc. she has swanned around partaking in; c. $48,000 "bonus" for teacher labor for student achievement transferred to her from Board enablers, the ones who hired her as the pre-designated political insider despite meager credentials including deficient literacy.
The Ouija Board predicts that the next $100,000 job for sycophant with degrees in basket weaving and thumb sucking goes to the new slot of food taster for Elia. This position looms because Dr. Rasputin Otero may have morphed into Ms. Elia's Best Boy after she defeated him for the superintendent sinecure with covert plans.
Rumors say Rasputin Otero's eyes gleam with malignant purpose on the full of the moon.
Poison forensics may pop up on the Board agenda. ROSSAC will undergo block-off with police red tape as a crime scene and featured on Court TV's "Forensic Files." Fun will be had by all.
Brown's data prompt me to write to Ms. Ms. Faliera:
Email on 4/14
Board Member Faliera:
To demonstrate that you want to hear from teachers, what about moving that a permanent slot go in the Board agenda for teachers to own a Board-forum place?
You also need to make sure that Ms. Elia and Professional-Standards-Abu-Ghraib Kipley--not to mention the network of snitches and collaborators must not retaliate against teachers. This snitch-collaborator network needs to understand that it can't harry teachers who address the Board. The snitches can't punish teachers who speak to the Board under the guise of cooked-up charges and "needs improvement" evaluations.
When I read this enlightened comment from you about teachers in Brown's column, one could have knocked me over with a feather. I had long since consigned you to the role of permanent ally to Elia's mischief. Perhaps I have misjudged you as being the dumbest member of the Board--not to mention Elia's girlfriend as gossip reports. I'll transfer that designation to Ms. Kurdell until I evaluate you further.
As to the epistemological assumptions of "policy" : "Policy" comes from Middle French "policier." Its relevant meaning is "to supervise the operation, execution, or administration of to prevent or detect and prosecute violations of rules and regulations."
That definition involves ample latitude for an effective Board to monitor Ms. Elia's implementation of this disastrous decision. Why was Elia's edict slapped in the teachers' faces with no warning? When did the Board order--never mind ask-- Elia to invite teachers to participate in the decision of how to implement this policy, using guidelines cited in the law? What strange lack of imagination caused the Board not to tell Ms. Elia to form a teacher committee to solve it? Why weren't some of the other alternatives listed in the law considered before jumping on the screw-the-teachers-with extra-work solution? Why don't y'all on the Board admonish Ms. Elia for her insulting arrogance to teachers about enacting this policy of major impact to them while excluding them from the loop of solving it?
Administration prevarication as a violation of policy: If a hundred meetings occurred to explain the policy, why was it so unknown, even to Board members? Why did Board member Griffin learn about it from her son? Why did you learn about the policy from other-than-administration sources? Why did Elia single out Olson and Kurdell to tell about the policy? Why didn't Olson and Kurdell have sense enough to remind her that such a catastrophe would need dissemination, diplomacy, and teacher involvement for teachers to accept such bitter medicine? How can the Board trust that a superintendent so obtuse that she writes junior-high prose adorned with punctuation errors has made the right call on implementing this policy of durance to bewildered and angered teachers?
Elia's latest mess-up makes imperative that the Board observe restraint or, better, retrenchment in piling money onto Elia as if she were a great superintendent instead of a disastrous one. The Board's history is to download more money on her mistakes. The worse Elia is, the more the Board pays her. The Board can't find money to pay teachers as do school leaders in enlightened states. But it can always pile more tax money on Elia and even steal money from teachers' raising student achievement to pass it on to Elia as a "bonus."
The only time I had an email from you, ma'am, was when you caterwauled about how unkind I have been to the Board. You served up be-nice rigmarole that Board members revert to when they can't take criticism that a public official should expect in a democracy. Instead, they whine about the incivility of somebody who points out their defects as a public servants. And they become fastidious diction experts of voter complaints. Forget about giving me this spiel. It doesn't affect my rhetorical style one jot.
What about emailing me pronto about whether you will bring up the teacher-slot motion to make a permanent place for teachers on the agenda? If you don't want to do it, I will continue to shop the proposal to Board members until some board paragon picks up on it--maybe your replacement after the next election.
Your replacement shall be one that will be one not far gone in the hypocrisy of saying how much he/she reveres teachers but refuses to allow them a talking post in the Board Agenda.
I hear you made an appointment with that young farmer to propitiate him after he said he lived in your district and would oppose your incumbency and get the other farm-bureau fellows to do likewise. That shows desperation, Ms. Faliera. Desperation is what you should feel. You don't serve students, teachers, staff, or citizens. You serve the administration Pod. You are ripe for replacement. There are only a few administrators; there are lots of teachers, staff, citizens, and students. Count votes yourself and repent.
If that farm guy to run for your seat, I will slap $500 in the farm fellow's hand the minute he announces; then I will beg teachers to support him with any money they can eke from the meager salaries and with feet-on-the-ground work for his campaign.
If that fellow runs against you, Ms. Faliera, you will lose. He's not only smarter than you; he's prettier.
lee drury de cesare
Brown's previous Tribune article pointed out that in other school districts voters elect the superintendent. Given the Board's and Elia's disrespect of teachers, it's time teachers found out how to get the election of the superintendent of Hillsborough County on the ballot. Voters can fire an elected superintendent; the Board won't fire Elia until hell freezes over and will probably next give her her own nuclear deterrent . The worse she gets, the more money the Board shovels on her. An elected superintendent would bypass the political Board-administration collusion that picks a superintendent of Elia's deficient academic record , experience, and management skills from the local no-talent ROSSAC dumbbells. No system could be worse than the present one.
The only time a Board member pays any attention to a complaint from a voter occurs when that voter threatens her/his incumbency. That's why the handsome farmer running against Faliera cheers me.
Hillsborough Teachers Actively Fighting Added Class Time
Published: Apr 13, 2007
Brown, thank God, has few writing errors. She has a weakness for passive verbs. She must have had a great 9th-grade English teacher. Her research in a previous article helped us compare this Board's bloated pay to Elia with the modest salaries of other counties. Brown did a better job than the SPT reporter in interviewing a range of people after the April 10th meeting and eliciting information from them.
Faced with teaching an extra period a day, high school teachers are e-mailing officials and drafting petitions. Angry and frustrated, they are challenging authority.
Some are surprised at their own grit.
"I've just never felt this way before," said Carey DiPompo, a 26-year veteran teacher and social studies department head at Alonso High School. She attended an impassioned Hillsborough County School Board meeting Tuesday with dozens of colleagues. "This is the first time in my career I've seen teachers take a stand."
They're directing their anger at the school board, but members said the decision was Superintendent MaryEllen Elia's to make, and they won't try to reverse her decision this year.
Teaching six instead of five classes a day is just the flashpoint, teachers and officials agree. The issues:
•Increased requirements and pressure from both federal No Child Left Behind law and state laws, including required remedial classes for struggling students. That makes a seven-period day for all students to maintain elective courses.
•Both honors and struggling students require more personal time, as do responding to parent e-mail and completing paperwork for accountability.
•The class-size amendment, which is supposed to make things better with fewer students in classes, is resulting in an extra class each day and job changes for many.
•Flat enrollments and an expected drop in state revenue sent districts scrambling to reduce costs.
Now would be a propitious time to get rid of the featherbedding administrators that clog ROSSAC and have nothing to do but throw spitballs into their garbage cans. State auditors found that Lennard (Earl the Pearl) surrounded himself with deadwood administrators, but he eschewed their advice to get rid of them for a year. I know because I asked him. Shallow-minded types like Earl the Pearl like to have a bunch of court jesters surrounding them to augment their sense of importance.
The protest started building in mid-February when teachers showed up en masse at a school board meeting. Tuesday night, a dozen speakers were joined by a chorus of hecklers.
I heard Chair Le Lamb say 20 were to speak: 17 teachers, 2 students, and I, bringing up the rear.
"I actually asked one woman heckler behind me to stop - you are hurting the movement here," Michael Schutz, the math department chairman at Plant City High, who addressed the board, said Thursday.
Heckling does not approach Elia's mistreatment of the teachers with the Board's silent collusion. Where is it written that teachers are honor bound to be Goody Twoshoes?
A national board hyphenated adjective certified teacher, Schutz asked the bigger question behind the unrest: "Where does the sacrifice of the teacher end?"
To add fuel, teachers and some school board members are smarting over being excluded from a process that brought major change to scheduling.
This exclusion should enrage them. It shows how little respect Elia and the Board have for teachers.
April Griffin, the school district's newest board member, said Wednesday that she heard about the change in student and teacher scheduling from her son when he told her his school was not going to be on a block schedule next year. That schedule uses longer classes on some days to fit yearlong courses into one semester.
Why did Griffin's son have to tell her about this radical poli cy? Does Elia have so little respect for the Board that she feels she doesn't need to inform it of such things?
As of August, block schedules The administration will eliminate...will be eliminated in nearly all high schools. They are being replaced by traditional seven-period days. Traditional seven-period days will replace them.
"This is an administrative decision," Griffin said, "but something this big needs to have consensus from the board."
Then what did Griffin do besides nattering post facto? She needs not only to complain but to act in time. Where is the record of her acting early when her son had to tell her about the change? This Board member disappoints.
Board member Susan Valdes said Thursday that she heard about the change when she started getting e-mail from parents, and member Jennifer Faliero said she found out when people approached her.
Are Valdez and Faliero paralyzed so that they could not get into Elia's office and tell her to hold on a minute?
Shouldn't these revelations have been imperatives for them to call Elia on this sneak change? Why is this Board so flaccid in performance? If its members were any less active, they would be motionless. They content themselves with being ceremonial Ken and Barbie dolls, handwringing to the press after the fact and posturing about the burdens of office.
This flaccid caving in to the administration and handwringing afterwards is how Board members get their feckless image. They heard disaster through unorthodox channels but wring their hands as if they were bystanders instead of major players. What ails them that they have not enough of chutzpah to call Elia out and make her accountable for this exclusion of not only the teachers but also the Board? We need some Board members with guts and an acceptance of the power of their jobs. I can't stand these weenies' mouthing post mortems with sadder-but-wiser poses for press consumption. They make me want to puke--the teachers, not the press, although sometimes the press makes me want to puke.
Longtime board members Candy Olson and Carol Kurdell said they were told early on by Elia. ...said Elia told them.
How come? Are they Elia's girlfriends informed at a sleepover pillow talk session? Why didn't they say she should call a meeting and tell the whole Board and the teachers of this decision? Why didn't they advise a press conference? This Elia confidence to Olson and Kurdell sounds like to me the old technique of favoritism that divides and conquers. Candy and and Carol fell for it. Smart people wouldn't have. These are dependable roundheels for administration ploys. I want some IQ forensics on these two and their transcripts from Psychology 101.
"MaryEllen told me, but I don't think she told a lot of people about the implications," Olson said. "I think I just figured it out."
This self-congratulatory maundering does not say much for Olson's sense of mission. Why in the hell didn't she figure out that all Board members and teachers must have the information pronto? And if she "just figured ... out" what the disastrous implications were, why did she sit inert and not share these inferences with other Board members and teachers affected? I worry that this specimen won't call 911 if her house catches on fire.
Board members agree the decision was the superintendent's to make.
The seven elected board members are Elia's bosses. They should not hesitate to let her know if she screws the teachers she will be out of a job.
"Policy" has epistemological scope for Board members with brains above the Stanford-Binet half mark. "Policy" has wide enough definition to allow the Board to oversee and shape how Elia carries out policy. If she conduct ed implementing this policy in the bull-in-a-china-shop way she that is her wont, she racks up another disaster to add to the overbuilt classrooms, the subsequent boundary brouhaha, the bad-statistics-for-the-country mess-up, and the criminal enterprise she oversaw when she as head of the Building Department, the Board should call her on her competence and truthfulness. It should, in fact, give her the boot.
Teachers said they felt slighted when they learned that the decision was made without their input.
"Teachers today really expect to be a great part of the process," board member Doretha Edgecomb said. "We talk a lot about collaboration and learning communities and shared leadership. We're really promoting that. Teachers have come to believe they should have a greater voice in the process."
This volt-face-inclusion-for-press-consumption of teachers' role does not coincide with Edgecomb's preaching to them about their "incivility" at the Board meeting. Ethridge talks out of both sides of her mouth. Diatribes against teacher behavior on the dais, ersatz statements of teacher inclusion to the press. How dumb does La Edgecomb think teachers are?
On Thursday, Elia admitted communication could have been better but said that more than 100 meetings have been held that the administration had held to explain and address the issue. Despite that, anger and rumors of layoffs persist.
This was her excuse in the boundary-changes dust-up that had parents' foaming at the mouth because of her duplicity. What ails this woman that she can't get information out that outlines policies and asks for input?
I want an independent prosecutor put on this claim of a hundred meetings. It strains credulity that there were a hundred meetings, yet four Board members learned of the schedule change in bizarre ways. Were these Board members too dumb to pick up on a hundred meetings? Two learned about it girlfriend fashion from Elia but did nothing to pass it to other Board members. The conviction grows upon me that public and teachers need an independent-prosecutor report on this claim. Let Dr. Hamilton subcontract one. He subcontracts everything else he is supposed to do right down to sharpening his pencil.
"No one in the school district is going to lose their job," Elia said.
Many in the system wish she would lose hers. Never to believe a word she says ranks imperative for survival.
One issue that has received little attention is equity, Elia said. Elementary and middle school teachers already teach 300 minutes a day.
And how is it that our Jesuitical thinker did not discover this disparity until she needed to solve a budget problem at the last minute because she did not plan for it ? Did she discuss the "equity" issue in past union negotiation processes? Or does Elia evoke this issue now because it presents a convenient peg on which to hang her clumsy handling of this issue?
"It was part of the larger context when this decision was made," Elia said.
Larger context, my foot. It was an ad hoc, off-the-cuff decision flung at the Board to see if it would stick, Elia's usual method. "I don't know how you can say one type of teaching position is easier than another."
Aw, c'mon. Now The Great Ponderer gets philosophical but can't come out with a crisp opinion. I witnessed that this woman did not have a bit of trouble calling up Lucco Brazzi Linda Kipley with dispatch the minute she walked into her office for the first time and telling her to manufacture an email-violation charge against Bart Birdsall to try out her new power wings with a sadistic faux charge against a lowly media specialist to impress her friends at the county who wanted him punished for complaining about the library kick-out of gays. Never in her life has Elia considered the larger context of anything. She lacks the intellectual fire power for strategic thinking. Her thinking is parochial small-bore.
Many of the teachers complaining are high school teachers who now receive extra pay for teaching an extra class, Elia said. Nearly 15 percent of the more than 4,300 high school teachers get that extra pay, she said.
Just as long as Elia continues to rape taxpayers with Board collusion with her bloated salary, perquisites, and rip-off bonus from teachers' raising students' scores, she can be clinical about any discussion of teachers' exploitation. Nobody is goring her ox.
Teachers scoff at that reasoning.
Brian Petkash, an English teacher at Leto High School, said he couldn't teach another class if he wanted to. "I work amazingly hard at the job. I love my job. I coach tennis after school and sponsor the literary magazine."
An extra class means 60 additional writing papers a week to grade, he said. "For me, I feel right on the edge of burnout."
Teachers said they have been inspired by others stepping forward, but few said they had much hope.
"I'm not hopeful, but I also feel it's our duty to let them know how we feel," said Sarah Robinson, an English teacher at Jefferson High School and an 18-year veteran teacher.
It's a mistake to roll over and be a good soldier. Where would the country be if the patriots rolled over for King George? You don't hear Elia giving up any of her undeserved bloated salary. You don't hear her eschewing stealing the bonus that teachers' work achieved. All sacrifices lie on the teachers' side. Teachers must stop their good-soldier martyr fetish and fight back.
For this year, the issue is over, board members said.
Teachers should not let weasely Board collaborators to get away with this cave-in. They should demand to know what the Board did before the Elia decision to prevent this catastrophe. Both Elia and they knew it was coming for a long time. The pod must have talked about it when its members weren't pondering the color of the icing for the cupcakes at the next ROSSAC tea party. Teachers should pledge to campaign against their re-election if the Board can't do a better job of protecting faculty rights than this catastrophe demonstrates. What good to teachers and the whole school family is this bunch of Board airheads who yield every decision to Elia and then call teachers uncivilized when they complain about their rip-off?
"I think it's done," Olson said "You need a motion, a second and a total of our votes."
This is clinical summation of teachers' misery. Olson is resigned to teachers' misfortune. Nobody's taking away a penny of her higher-than-beginning-teachers' salary, so she doesn't give a flip . Teachers should become Greek Erinies to La Olson and dog the daylights out of her for abandoning them to Elia's depredation. They should follow her to the gym and to the Athena Society, which Nancy Ford started to ratify the ERA but has devolved into a ladies-who-lunch gaggle.
The union has started negotiating with district officials for the next three-year contract that will start with the 2007-08 school year.
Yvonne Lyons, executive director of the Hillsborough Classroom Teachers Association, said Thursday that teaching six of seven class periods likely is a reality for the next school year because teachers now are being scheduled.
This in-bed-with-the-administration union is a bust for teachers. They extort teacher money from meager salaries but have refused to post theirs on the CTA information-lite Web site. Teachers should get new people as CTA functionaries or get a new union. Two Pinellas CTA officers told me at Suncoast Tiger Bay that its officers had counseled Hillsborough CTA but that it hadn't had any effect. Where was the union when it should have alerted teachers to the coming debacle? Cozying up to the administration is my guess and taking Elia's cleaning to the cleaners when not walking her dog.
"We have teachers' attention in the political process, which is really not a bad thing," Lyons said. Union representatives can direct teachers to an online survey about the issue, she said.
"Really not a bad thing?" How much more tepid can an administration nates-kissing union suck-up get in her grudging admission of her clients to take on the task of defending themselves against the administration, the Board, and the union trifecta?
Something may have changed already with the backlash from teachers, however.
Board member Faliero said she supports Elia's decision but was "invigorated" by Tuesday's response.
"Invigorated," is she? The change of Faliera's tune is, I infer, a result of her seeing her incumbency threatened by the farm guy and his people and maybe even mild-mannered teachers. That fear is what invigorates her. She is quite late in her "invigoration" because of hearing from teachers. They would have been happy to see her visit high schools for chats in the past. But she repined in the cotton wadding of the ROSSAC pod.
In fact, teachers should expect to see all Board members at their schools . When teachers organize a response team, they can invite Board members for heart-to-hearts at their schools. They can serve cupcakes in the Board member's favorite color and just whip their questions on them.
One psychological problem is that teachers are too modest to acknowledge their power. Fact: Teachers' credibility with the public is sky high. I have had the mothers of law-school--graduate children approach me in Publix to tell me how grateful they are that their offspring left my class a literate man or woman. Teachers should tap into this public respect to deal with the enemies of teachers--Board and administration--in the ROSSAC bunker.
"People are finally reacting," Faliero said. "They are actually standing for something. It's about time."
Anybody who believes Faliera sincere in this asseveration is probably still doing homage to the Tooth Fairy.
The threat to her defeat at election time has jolted La Faliera into this revolution in her thinking. The prettiest Board member may also be the sneakiest and the most self-serving, although Allah and the Corn Spirit know she's got competition for that title from Board colleagues.
THE 300-MINUTE ISSUE
Hillsborough County high school teachers are protesting a change from teaching from 260 and 270 minutes a day in up to five classes to teaching six classes a day for more than 300 minutes. They say teaching quality and students will suffer because of reduced time to prepare for an extra class, grade papers and counsel students.
Schools Superintendent MaryEllen Elia said she made the change to reduce the number of new teachers needed, saving $28 million for teacher salary increases. Otherwise, the district would be forced to hire weaker or unqualified teachers to meet requirements of the state class-size amendment, she said.
Reporter Marilyn Brown can be reached at email@example.com or (813) 259-8069.