Wednesday, March 07, 2007




From: lee decesare [mailto:tdecesar@tampabay.rr.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2007 5:02 PM
To: 'mhkeen@educationfoundation.com'
Cc: 'justice.charlie.web@flsenate.gov'; 'dicks.john.web@flsenate.com'; 'dodsen.billweb@fl.senate.com'; 'victor.crist.web@flsenate.com'; 'michael.sciontiweb@house.gov'; 'culp.faye@flsenate.gov'; April Griffin (april.griffin@sdk12.fl.us); Dabonich@aol.com; edgecomb (doretha.edgecomb@sdhc.k12.fl.us); Edith A Tobul (edt@ncweb.com); faliero (jennifer.faliero@sdhc.k12.fl.us); Frank Sanchez (pacojs1@aol.com); Jack Lamb (Jack.Lamb@sdhc.k12.fl.us); montolino (montolino@aol.com); Tiger Bay Club of Tampa (tigerbay@tampabay.rr.com); valdes (susan.valdes@sdhc.k12.fl.us); Warren Rachels (WRACHELS@tampabay.rr.com); 'justice.charlie.web@flsenate.gov'; 'rlong@hcc.cc.fl.us'; 'candy.olson@sdhc.k12.fl.us'; 'carolynAdams-Wallace@hcc.cc.fl.us'; 'waltellis@hcc.cc.fl.us'; 'ericjoost@hcc.cc.fl.us'; 'Tami Simms-Powel'; 'paultash@sptimes.com'; 'johnhill@sptimes.com'; 'letitiastein@sptimes.com'; 'mdjean@msn.com'; Susan Valdez (susanvaldez@tampabay.rr.com); 'Patrick Manteiga'; 'genenj1@yahoo.com'; 'joyner.arthenia.web@flsenate.gov'; 'JudithChambers@hcc.cc.fl.us'; 'JimMajor@educationfoundation.com'; 'gregoryComnes@hcc.cc.fl.us'
Subject:

Mr. Keen, Education Foundation, pray deliver a copy of this email to all members listed on your Web site of the Education Foundation. Thank you. lee drury de cesare tdecesar@tampabay.rr.com


Late news: I have learned that the secret donor of Ms. Elia’s “We Deliver” prize is non-existent. A plot is afoot to make the Education Foundation or some other sucker corporation money bags for the $10,000 prize.


I will write to the CEOs of any of the local affiliates in the Education Foundation roster to complain about the misuse of corporate money to underwrite administration and School- Board abuse of the Foundation for Ms. Elia’s prize scam to cover over the suppurating sore of the rotten practices of the administration in hiring and in other ROSAC skullduggeries.


The business community must not underwrite malpractice in education that corrupt hiring practices represent. These award top $100,000-plus jobs to buddies and sycophants with no advertising for superior candidates. This jobs scam deprives the citizens of good value for their tax money and deprives the students of top-quality administration talent that tax money should buy for the school system. Local corporate representatives underwriting a debased administration hiring policy would be bad for the students and bad for the integrity of the honorable role of education in a society.


lee drury de cesare

tdecesar@tampabay.rr.com


This is what the Education Foundation says it does: The Hillsborough Education Foundation is an independent not-for-profit organization whose purpose is to help the School District of Hillsborough County teachers and students excel in programs that are not funded by public tax revenues. Led by a volunteer Board of Directors made up of business, education and community leaders, the Foundation has raised $52 million since its inception in 1988.


This Education Foundation, listed on the School Board Web page, appears to be a corporate-school-bureaucracy flimflam.

If the Education Foundation cared about education, its members’ would have examined how the Hillsborough County School Board deals with the entrenched administration’s members’ using their positions in a jobs racket and the School Board’s toleration of the situation.


For years the choice of superintendent has been a Board-administration jobs-program manipulated by a cadre of in-house power appropriators that maneuver to name an on-site superintendent to continue hegemony over the school system’s lucrative control. This cadre ignores better-qualified outside candidates who apply for a nationally advertised job the faux advertising of which costs $35,000 to tax payers for the superintendent. The superintendent appoints other top jobs to buddies and sycophants while the School Board looks the other way.


Greedy, power-hungry, grammar-punctuation-challenged insiders have already insinuated Ms. Elia into the supervisor’s job. Her supervisory experience was in the Hillsborough County building department, where she overlooked real-estate misdoing while she overbuilt classrooms. Her academic background is mediocre, and she can’t handle grammar and punctuation in her writing. The Board colluded with the administration powerbrokers to appoint Ms. Elia, even lowering the degree requirement.




Administrators in this jobs scam want the top administrative slots not for love of education but for love of the power of dispensing the taxpayer budget and its perquisites.

Two $120,000 administrators are presently home-ec- and kindergarten- trained.


Ms. Elia makes $262,000 a year plus perquisites. The below writing sample’s announcing her gimcrack prize to divert attention from her incompetence and the level of her literacy skills is revealing. The superintendent of Boston makes less than Ms. Elia. He is literate and leads one of the most prestigious school systems in the Number-One state in education in the country. Massachusetts has a state law that requires all administrative candidates including superintendents to take the same language tests as teachers take. That law in Florida would have weeded out at least half of the upper administration $100,000-plus jobs at ROSAC.


If only one of these flossy Education-Foundation businesses pressed the Hillsborough County legislative delegation to pass a law similar to that of Massachusetts, the members would hop to it, and Florida would have fewer marginally literate administrators the bloated salaries of which eat up tax dollars that should go to students’ education.


Such incompetence at the top explains the source of why corporations complain about getting job applicants who can’t write. If the superintendent makes $262,000—more than the Boston superintendent—with such feeble literacy as she demonstrates below, why should she care about students’ graduating with such language deficiencies as I saw entering my college freshman English classes? At their entry, county students were unable to write and punctuate a literate sentence much less an essay.


The corporate world should not complain about illiterate job applicants if it colludes with the corruption of the local school administration and the Board’s supporting it. Corporations should not preen as good community citizens if their representatives sit on a school foundation that underwrites such corrosive practices that undermine the high purpose of education.


lee drury de cesare


POLICY of School Administration Rubberstamped by the Board is routinely flouted. The superintendent passes around administrative jobs with bloated salaries to sycophants and buddies with no advertising. Board plays deaf and dumb. No wonder Florida is low in national standing. Voters don’t get top personnel for these bloated salaries; they get 2nd- and 3rd-rate people in jobs that they don’t have the credentials or the brains to deal with.

Excellence comes from the top. The Number One state in national ratings is Massachusetts. A Massachusetts state law requires that all administrative candidates must take a language test just as the teachers do to get their jobs. That

901 East Kennedy Boulevard, Tampa, Florida 33602 USA

Top of Form

I am nominating:

First Name: Maryellen

Last Name: Elia

Work Location: ROSAC Hot-Air Palace

Job/Position: Ultimate Decider and Bad Punctuator

My Information:

My Name: Lee Drury De Cesare
My Phone:
727-398-4142

Email:tdecesar@tampabay.rr.com

Web Page:http://www.leedrurydecesarescasting-roomcouch.blogspot.com

I am a:
Student
Parent
Community Member and

Hapless citizen

Nomination for We-Deliver Award

La Elia Delivers Piffle

Whopping superintendent hubris makes the We-Deliver prize a slam dunk for La Elia.


Ms. Elia fantasizes that people are too dumb to notice that this bread-and-circuses gimcrack aims to divert attention from her sorry record.


Ms. Elia exploits teachers by treating them as coolies, not professionals.


Not only did Ms. Elia pass off as a bona fide raise at the beginning of the school year the accumulation of neglected past raises for teachers, but she now orders teachers to take on extra classes without pay to balance her budget while she gets $262,000 and perquisites for shoddy performance. Her effrontery comes from her conviction that teachers are too scared of her Professional Standards SS terror machine to stand up and say, “Enough!”

Elia’s administrative performance includes ignoring real-estate fraud in the building department. She also overbuilt classrooms while there and later scrambled school boundaries as superintendent to cover up this incompetence while uprooted and

sobbing tots clung to their mothers’ skirts.


Superintendent Elia flouts vaunted “We-are-an-equal-opportunity-employer” Web slogan and has turned the hiring process into a jobs racket by hiring unqualified sycophants and buddies without advertising for jobs for which they lack credentials.


Linda Kipley, who sports a Paleolithic home-ec degree, reigns Professional Standards Cell Block Lucco Brazzi, getting $120,000 for sadistic treatment of the unfortunates with better credentials than hers who come within her power. That Kipley sinecure got no advertising.


Most recently La Elia rammed through for Dr. Jim Hamilton a $132,000 boutique perch. He got the job before its description posted. The old huffer and puffer prances ROSAC Rasputin to tell La Elia what to do while being unable, the record shows, to distinguish between "your" and "you're."


To top off the reasons for La Elia’s meriting the We-Deliver certificate is that, despite being the least-qualified candidate, she filched the superintendent job through labyrinthine ROSAC politics even though every other finalist was better qualified than she.

Finally, Elia merits We-Deliver champ status because, at the top of a school system dedicated to instilling literacy in the young, she can’t punctuate and handle grammar at the level students need to achieve to graduate. See her award text below for confirmation.

Ms. Elia requires the $10,000 We-Deliver prize to add to her bloated salary for walking-around money to treat Rasputin Jimbo and other layabout administrator-C-students to chocolate-covered truffles while teachers labor gratis and bus drivers get third-world wages and broken-down buses in which to transport students.

The district must fork over the “We Deliver” award to La Maryellen Elia for sustained performance in ripping off faculty, hiring as bloated-salary administrators academic weakling buddies and sycophants, mauling grammar and punctuation, promulgating hanky-panky, employing smoke and mirrors, and churning out spin, spin, spin ‘till Daddy Takes Her T-Bird Away.

******

Prentice-Hall is the hefty, expensive-for-taxpayers text for English classes. Ms. Elia’s We-Deliver text shows that she not only writes without felicity but that she also messes-up on basic grammar and punctuation that students must know to graduate.

******

Maximum-leader Pronunciamento:

Grammar-Punctuation Errors Flagged—Excellence in Education Indeed

At the annual back-to-school news conference, I announced an employee Hyphen: hyphenate two-or- more words before a noun acting as a single adjective--Prentice Hall 747. recognition initiative to celebrate the fact Inexact diction: "miracles happen every day" is not a fact. that miracles happen every day in Hillsborough County Public Schools. We will give a cash award to the district employee who best exemplifies the spirit of “we deliver” miracles Close quotation marks after “miracles” every day.

We have formed a broad-based committee Easiest comma-rule error: Prentice Hall 694 and now we are soliciting nominations. With my input, the committee will select a field of finalists whose contributions we will celebrate.


The winner will get a check for $10,000.

It will be hard to pick five finalists. It will be harder to pick just one winner. This is a symbolic recognition – and a significant reward.

The point, of course, is to highlight some of those employees who are committed to do all they can. I know that our employees deliver miracles every day. Not everyone seeks recognition for what they Pronoun-antecedent agreement problem: Prentice Hall 600 do for our students and the district, so if you know someone like that, please fill out the nomination form.


Anyone and everyone in the district is Prentice Hall 592 eligible to win. Either the compound subject represents a subject-verb agreement error, or if “anyone” and “everyone” parse as one person under a little-used, abstruse rule, then the author subsequently falls into pronoun-antecedent error. This dilemma in grammar parlance amounts to being caught between Scylla and Charybdis as they say in Plant City or as struggling between a rock and a hard place as Cambridge dons put the problem. Prentice Hall 592 All they need to do is make a difference, give it their all, and deliver miracles every day for the children, Redundant Comma: Prentice Hall 694 for the taxpayers and for the community.


Nominate a co-worker, supervisor, or even yourself. You can include your name on the nomination form, or you can remain anonymous. Keep in mind that the winner will be decided on the merits of the nomination, not the number of nominations he or she receives, although we will make note of that.

Parents, students, business partners and others in the community are also welcome to submit nominations. If a teacher, secretary, custodian, principal, aide Comma: Prentice Hall 696 or other staff member has gone above and beyond their Pronoun-antecedent disagreement--Prentice Hall 600 job description, that’s the person we’re looking for.


School Board members, district and school staff Comma: Prentice Hall 696 and I will surprise the winner at their Pronoun-antecedent disagreement--Prentice Hall 6 00 work site on Friday, May 11. The winner will be presented with a $10,000 check in their Pronoun-antecedent disagreement--Prentice Hall 600 name that they Pronoun-antecedent disagreement-Prentice Hall 600 can use however they Pronoun-antecedent disagreement--Prentice Hall 600 wish. Click here to access the online form. All nominations must be received by Monday,


April 2, 2007.

MaryEllen Elia,

Superintendent of Schools

********

Extracting public information from government people supposed to render it up to a citizen according to the Sunshine law requires a sturdy refusal on the part of the citizen to be turned aside. A citizen keeps asking the official sitting on the information to yield it up in accordance with the Sunshine Law until the bureaucrat buckles.


There is always a reason for an official’s keeping secret public information—in this case the source of the We-Deliver prize money. I have some surmises about why in this case the source of the prize funds is secret. If it redounded to the credit of the secret-keeper, Ms. Elia, the information would appear instantly. If it doesn’t, there is a tug of war between the citizen and the reluctant tax-paid functionary. The latter reason has this citizen's vote. The information that the Foundation or some other corporate sucker was supposed to deliver the money in time to award the $10,000 prize flummoxed me. Apparently, Ms. Elia violates the maxim that says you don’t count your corporate-sucker chickens before they hatch the golden egg.


A citizen is bound to win who hangs on; he or she will in the end get the data. The law and ethics are on the citizen's side.

lee drury de cesare

*****

Second request

Ms. Cobbe: What is the source of money for the We Deliver award? Who generated the idea? I would like to have that information and any material accompanying its generation as public documents. Thank you.

lee drury de cesare

2/22/07

There are no documents related to this, other than the text of the superintendent's back to school news conference speech. It was her idea. The money is from private sources.

2/22/07

Who are the private sources?

lee drury de cesare

Ms. Cobbe: What are the names on the "broad-based" committee to pick the winner? Thank you. Lee Drury De Cesare


From: lee decesare [mailto:tdecesar@tampabay.rr.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2007 3:11 PM
To: 'Linda Cobbe'
Cc: 'Tom Gonzalez'; 'letititiastein@sptimes.com'; 'jhill@sptimes.com'; 'patrickmanteiga@lagacetanewspaper.com'
Subject: RE: public information Gene, call this to Patrick's attention.


From: Linda Cobbe [mailto:lcobbe@sdhc.us]
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2007 1:47 PM
To: lee decesare
Subject: Re: public information

I don't know the source or sources.

Linda Cobbe
External Communications
Manager

Ms. Elia does. Ask her. And if the superintendent declines to give the name of whoever donated the prize money for the We-Deliver prize, then ask the school attorney for an opinion on the secrecy of this source as it relates to public information since it has to do with public business--a prize involving the whole school system and even the community.

The source of the prize money should not be secret. If it is self-promotion of her superintendence by Ms. Elia, we in the public should know that information.

lee drury de cesare

***

ROSAC functionaries are reluctant to ask Ms. Elia a question. There is the inchoate fear that they will lose their jobs for their effrontery at asking for facts. Thus, the citizen should step up and ask Elia herself to protect the bureaucrat from administration habit of retaliation. Elia doesn’t answer emails. I believe that is due to her knowing that that her writing skills are sub-par. Her suspicions are correct. But this superintendent manqué registers the question and passes it back to the public-affairs people. Sooner or later, you will get an answer if you pound away.

Ditto for emails to Board members. They go into hiding once elected, believing that they have been elevated to the purple, not to public service. The secret to eliciting responses from the Board is to repeat the query as many times as necessary to draw the members out of their caves for a response.

***

April Griffin (April.griffin@sdk12.fl.us); Edgecomb (Dorothy.Edgecomb@sdhc.k12.fl.us); Jack Lamb (Jack.Lamb@sdhc.k12.fl.us); Susan Valdez (Susan Valdez@tampabay.rr.com); 'candy.Olson@sdhc.k12.fl.us'; 'letititiastein@sptimes.com'; 'patrickmanteiga@lagacetanewspaper.com'; 'genenj1@yahoo.com'; 'jhill@sptimes.com

Ms. Elia: Ms. Cobbe of the Public Information office does not know this information. Pray provide it as public information. 1. Who is the source of the We-Deliver prize listed on the schools Web Home Page? 2. What are the names of the people on the award committee? Thank you.

lee drury de cesare

Mon 3/5/2007 8:50 PM

(maryellen.elia@sdhc.k12.fl.)

April Griffin (april.griffin@sdk12.fl.us); edgecomb (doretha.edgecomb@sdhc.k12.fl.us); faliero (jennifer.faliero@sdhc.k12.fl.us); Jack Lamb (Jack.Lamb@sdhc.k12.fl.us); Tiger Bay Club of Tampa (tigerbay@tampabay.rr.com); Susan Valdez (susanvaldez@tampabay.rr.com); 'candy.olson@sdhc.k12.fl.us'; 'letitiastein@sptimes.com'; 'Patrick Manteiga'; 'genenj1@yahoo.com'; 'Tom Gonzalez'

Ms. Elia: This is the second public-information request that I have sent you for the source of the money for the "We Deliver" auction. You announce the contest on the School Board Web page and use the school imprimatur to authenticate its legitimacy, so it is school business.

The school system is not your private plaything, ma'am. The Web page announces school, not private, business. You must respond to a citizen's request for public information about your activities related to the school system. If you are not sure about the status of your we-deliver prize's source, ask the school attorney for an opinion.

Pray send me the public information requested.

lee drury de cesare

Ms. Elia: Second request: What are the names of the people on the “We Deliver” prize committee?

lee drury de cesare

tdecesar@tampabay.rr.com


Sunday, February 25, 2007

I can't figure out how to relocate the data column; so you have to go down the page until you encounter my latest entries: one a response to a question about the attorney's preparation of the information pamphlet for Professional Standards for teachers referred there; then the "We Deliver" prize nomination of Ms. Elia. ldd















































Deepthroat: Tom Gonzalez is a real person: he is the School Board attorney. Yes, he is creating a publication to tell teachers their rights when they go into the Professional Standards Cell Block. You can contact him--anonymously if you like--at tgonzalez@tsg-law.com. He is paid by the taxpayers to do the Board's legal business and is assembling data to answer the questions teachers have when they get referred to Professional Standards because the union and the administration have not provided these data to teachers who must run the Professional Standards gauntlet. What Mr. Gonzalez is doing is at the behest of Board Member Lamb, and Mr. Gonzalez would welcome data that you provide. lee













Top of Form

We Deiver

I am nominating:

First Name: Maryellen

Last Name: Elia

Work Location: ROSAC Hot-Air Palace

Job/Position: Ultimate Decider and Bad Punctuator



My Information:

My Name: Lee Drury De Cesare
My Phone:
727-398-4142

Email:tdecesar@tampabay.rr.com

Web Page:http://www.leedrurydecesarescasting-roomcouch.blogspot.com

I am a :
Student
Parent
Community Member and

Hapless citizen

Nomination for We-Deliver Award

La Elia Delivers Piffle

Whopping superintendent hubris makes the We-Deliver prize a slam dunk for La Elia. Ms. Elia fantasizes that people are too dumb to notice that this bread-and-circuses gimcrack aims to divert attention from her sorry record.


Ms. Elia exploits teachers by treating them like coolies, not professionals.


Not only did Ms. Elia pass off as a bona fide raise at the beginning of the school year the accumulation of neglected past raises for teachers, but she now orders teachers to take on extra classes without pay to balance her budget while she gets $262,000 and perquisites for shoddy performance. She does so from her conviction that teachers are too scared of her Professional Standards SS terror machine to stand up and say, “Enough!”


Elia’s administrative performance includes ignoring real-estate fraud in the building department. She also overbuilt classrooms while there and later scrambled school boundaries as superintendent to cover up this incompetence while uprooted and sobbing tots clung to their mothers’ skirts.


Superintendent Elia flouts vaunted “We-are-an-equal-opportunity-employer” Web slogan by hiring unqualified sycophants and buddies without advertising for jobs for which they lack credentials. Linda Kipley, who sports a Paleolithic home-ec degree, reigns Professional Standards Cell Block czar, getting $120,000 for sadistic treatment of the unfortunates with better credentials who come within her power. That Kipley sinecure no advertising. Most recently La Elia rammed through for Dr. Jim Hamilton a $132,000 boutique perch. He got the job before its description posted. The old huffer and puffer prances ROSAC Rasputin to tell La Elia what to do while being unable, the record shows, to distinguish between "your" and "you're."

To top off the reasons for La Elia’s meriting the We-Deliver certificate is that, despite being the least-qualified candidate, she filched the superintendent job through labyrinthine ROSAC politics even though every other finalist was better qualified than she.


Finally, Elia merits We-Deliver champ status because, at the top of a school system dedicated to instilling literacy in the young, she can’t punctuate and handle grammar at the level students need to achieve to graduate. See her award text below for confirmation.


Ms. Elia requires the $10,000 We-Deliver prize to add to her bloated salary for walking-around money to treat Rasputin Jimbo and other layabout administrator-C-students to chocolate-covered truffles while teachers labor gratis and bus drivers get third-world wages and broken-down buses in which to transport students.

The district must fork over the “We Deliver” award to La Maryellen Elia for sustained performance in ripping off faculty, hiring as bloated-salary administrators academic weaklings, mauling grammar and punctuation, promulgating hanky-panky, employing smoke and mirrors, and churning out spin, spin, spin ‘till Daddy Takes Her T-Bird Away.

******

Prentice-Hall is the hefty, expensive-for-taxpayers text for English classes. Ms. Elia’s We-Deliver text shows that she not only writes without felicity but that she also messes-up on basic grammar and punctuation that students must know to graduate.

******

Maximum-leader Pronunciamento:

Grammar-Punctuation Errors Flagged—Excellence in Education Indeed

At the annual back-to-school news conference, I announced an employee Hyphen: hyphenate two-or- more words before a noun acting as a single adjective--Prentice Hall 747. recognition initiative to celebrate the fact Inexact diction: "miracles happen every day"is not a fact. that miracles happen every day in Hillsborough County Public Schools. We will give a cash award to the district employee who best exemplifies the spirit of “we deliver” miracles Close quotation marks after “miracles” every day.


We have formed a broad-based committee Easiest comma-rule error: Prentice Hall 694 and now we are soliciting nominations. With my input, the committee will select a field of finalists whose contributions we will celebrate.

The winner will get a check for $10,000.


It will be hard to pick five finalists. It will be harder to pick just one winner. This is a symbolic recognition – and a significant reward.

The point, of course, is to highlight some of those employees who are committed to do all they can. I know that our employees deliver miracles every day. Not everyone seeks recognition for what they Pronoun-antecedent agreement problem: Prentice Hall 600 do for our students and the district, so if you know someone like that, please fill out the nomination form.

Anyone and everyone in the district is Prentice Hall 592 eligible to win. Either the compound subject represents a subject-verb agreement error, or if “anyone” and “everyone” parse as one person under a little-used, questionable grammar rule, then the author subsequently falls into pronoun-antecedent error. This dilemma in grammar parlance amounts to being caught between Scylla and Charybdis as they say in Plant City or as struggling between a rock and a hard place as Cambridge dons put the problem. Prentice Hall 592 All they need to do is make a difference, give it their all, and deliver miracles every day for the children, for the taxpayers Comma: Prentice Hall 694 and for the community.

Nominate a co-worker, supervisor, or even yourself. You can include your name on the nomination form, or you can remain anonymous. Keep in mind that the winner will be decided on the merits of the nomination, not the number of nominations he or she receives, although we will make note of that.

Parents, students, business partners and others in the community are also welcome to submit nominations. If a teacher, secretary, custodian, principal, aide
Comma: Prentice Hall or other staff member has gone above and beyond their Pronoun-antecedent disagreement--Prentice Hall job description, that’s the person we’re looking for.

School Board members, district and school staff Comma: Prentice Hall and I will surprise the winner at their Pronoun-antecedent disagreement--Prentice Hall work site on Friday, May 11. The winner will be presented with a $10,000 check in their Pronoun-antecedent disagreement--Prentice Hall 600 name that theyPronoun-antecedent disagreement--Prentice Hall 600 can use however they theyPronoun-antecedent disagreement--Prentice Hall 600 wish.

Click here to access the online form. All nominations must be received by Monday, April 2, 2007.

MaryEllen Elia,

Superintendent of Schools

********

Nominate a co-worker, supervisor, Consistency: Here La Elia gets the standard items-in-a-series correct; other places, she flouts the rule. or even yourself. You can include your name on the nomination form, or you can remain anonymous. Keep in mind that the winner will be decided on the merits of the nomination, not the number of nominations he or she receives, although we will make note of that.

Parents, students, business partners Comma: Prentice Hall 694 and others in the community are also welcome to submit nominations. If a teacher, secretary, custodian, principal, aide Prentice Hall 694 or other staff member has gone above and beyond their Prentice Hall 600 job description, that’s the person we’re looking for.

School Board members, district and school staff Comma: Prentice Hall 694 and I will surprise the winner at their Pronoun-antecedent disagreement: Prentice Hall 600 work site on Friday, May 11. The winner will be presented with a $10,000 check in their Pronoun-antecedent agreement problem: Prentice Hall 600 name that they Prentice Hall 600 can use however they Prentice Hall 600 wish.

Click here to access the online form. All nominations must be received by Monday, April 2, 2007.

MaryEllen Elia,

Superintendent of Schools

Extracting public information from government people supposed to render it up to a citizen according to the Sunshine law requires a sturdy refusal on the part of the citizen to be turned aside. A citizen keeps asking the official sitting on the information to yield it up in accordance with the Sunshine Law until the bureaucrat buckles. The citizen does so as many times as it takes to procure success.

There is always a reason for an official’s keeping secret public information—in this case the source of the We-Deliver prize money. I have some surmises about why in this case the source of the prize funds is secret. If it redounded to the credit of the secret-keeper, Ms. Elia, the information would appear instantly. If it doesn’t, there is a tug of war between the citizen and the reluctant tax-paid functionary. The latter has this citizen's vote.


A citizen is bound to win who hangs on; he or she will in the end get the data. The law and ethics are on the citizen's side.


lee drury de cesare

*****

Second request

Ms. Cobbe: What is the source of money for the We Deliver award? Who generated the idea? I would like to have that information and any material accompanying its generation as public documents. Thank you.

lee drury de cesare

2/22/07

There are no documents related to this, other than the text of the superintendent's back to school news conference speech. It was her idea. The money is from private sources.

2/22/07

Who are the private sources?

lee drury de cesare

Ms. Cobbe: What are the names on the "broad-based" committee to pick the winner? Thank you. Lee Drury De Cesare


From: lee decesare [mailto:tdecesar@tampabay.rr.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2007 3:11 PM

To: 'Linda Cobbe'
Cc:
'Tom Gonzalez'; 'letititiastein@sptimes.com'; 'jhill@sptimes.com'; 'patrickmanteiga@lagacetanewspaper.com'
Subject: RE: public information Gene, call this to Patrick's attention.


From: Linda Cobbe [mailto:lcobbe@sdhc.us]
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2007 1:47 PM

To: lee decesare
Subject: Re: public information

I don't know the source or sources.

Linda Cobbe
External Communications Manager

Ms. Elia does. Ask her. And if the superintendent declines to give the name of whoever donated the prize money for the We-Deliver prize, then ask the school attorney for an opinion on the secrecy of this source as it relates to public information since it has to do with public business--a prize involving the whole school system and even the community.

The source of the prize money should not be secret. If it is self-promotion of her superintendence by Ms. Elia, we in the public should know that information.

lee drury de cesare

***

ROSAC functionaries are reluctant to ask Ms. Elia a question. There is the inchoate fear that they will lose their jobs for their effrontery at asking for facts. Thus, the citizen should step up and ask Elia herself to protect the bureaucrat from administration habit of retaliation. Elia doesn’t answer emails. I believe that is due to her knowing that that her writing skills are sub-par. Her suspicions are correct. But this superintendent manqué registers the question and passes it back to the public-affairs people. Sooner or later, you will get an answer if you pound away.


Ditto for emails to Board members. They go into hiding once elected, believing that they have been elevated to the purple, not to public service. The secret to eliciting responses from the Board is to repeat the query as many times as necessary to draw the members out of their caves for a response.

***

April Griffin (April.griffin@sdk12.fl.us); Edgecomb (Dorothy.Edgecomb@sdhc.k12.fl.us); Jack Lamb (Jack.Lamb@sdhc.k12.fl.us); Susan Valdez (Susan Valdez@tampabay.rr.com); 'candy.Olson@sdhc.k12.fl.us'; 'letititiastein@sptimes.com'; 'patrickmanteiga@lagacetanewspaper.com'; 'genenj1@yahoo.com'; 'jhill@sptimes.com


Ms. Elia: Ms. Cobbe of the Public Information office does not know this information. Pray provide it as public information. 1. Who is the source of the We-Deliver prize listed on the schools Web Home Page? 2. What are the names of the people on the award committee?

Thank you.


lee drury de cesare

Monday, February 05, 2007

Bart Birdsall Gets Letter of Apology with no Help from CTA

From: Montolino@aol.com [mailto:Montolino@aol.com]
Sent: Sunday, February 04, 2007 11:10 PM
To: Yvonne.Lyons@floridaea.org
Cc: Jean.Clements@floridaea.org; Chuck.Kiker@floridaea.org; tdecesar@tampabay.rr.com
Subject: Letter

Yvonne, Jean, and Chuck,

Tom Gonzalez tells me I will get the letter I continue to ask for......this is the letter Linda Kipley promised me in my meeting with her back in July 2005. Back then she said I would receive a letter that the meeting with her was satisfactory. However, I never received such a letter. Instead, I received what I feel was a threatening letter in a nasty tone with absolutely no wording stating that the meeting was satisfactory or the outcome was good. Around the same time I had a co-worker spread lies that I am about to be fired back when all this happened. He assumed this after a downtown person, who used to be a friend, told him the whole story.

I asked Tom Gonzalez to make sure the letter is the type that I can show anyone the letter as proof that I am not going to be fired to counteract rumors.

I wish CTA had made sure this letter was written to me back in August 2005. I think Kipley owed me this letter, and since she said I would receive it in the presence of a CTA rep, I should have received it.

But I am getting the letter through my own insistence. It is taking me almost 2 years to get the letter that Kipley owes me. Tom says I will get it. If I do, I will finally be able to put everything to rest and move on with my life. If I do not get it, I will probably attend every single school board meeting and talk about Linda Kipley owing me an apology for lying to my face during an investigation and for bringing up issues (a newspaper article and the Joe Stines emails) that she had no right to bring up during the investigation (and she even admitted I was not called into Professional Standards for those issues but she made a point of trying to scare me that MaryEllen Elia gave her those items).

I believe in being nice, but when I feel I have been wronged I will defend myself to the nth degree. I believe powerful people must be held accountable for their nonsense.

Below is a column about Molly Ivins. I believe CTA should work toward her goal: holding powerful people accountable......I feel that the culture at CTA is a "don't rock the boat, just work on FEA type issues that effect education, but don't make anyone important mad...." type of culture. It's a "let's help the teachers as long as it doesn't cause a rift in our relationship with the bigwigs" culture. I feel there are times you have to rock the boat and should, especially when it holds powerful people accountable and keeps them from abusing their power and harming others.

I am hoping the article below will inspire you all to be braver in helping teachers, when they have a problem or issue. I continue to be a CTA member, I continue to encourage new teachers to join, and, in return, I feel you owe teachers more when they are upset or in trouble.

Bart
Missing Molly Ivins
By PAUL KRUGMAN

CTA:

Pray allow me to lodge an official rebuke from a former FUSA president at HCC that you of Hillsborough County CTA let down a member whom you charge $500 a year despite your pusillanimous bowing and scraping to the administration when it mistreats teachers.

By dint of his persistence, Bart has petitioned Dr. Lamb to have the Board attorney survey the situation and has finally prevailed to a degree. The Board attorney will soon issue a pamphlet outlining teachers' rights who go to Professional Standards--on trumped-up charges in Bart's case and in others.

The administration uses Professional Standards as a sneaky punishment device not for infractions but for getting back at teachers for doing something the administration doesn't approve. In Bart's case, it was his participation in the gay protest to the library-shutdown privileges for gays.

This administration has a long and unlovely history of tolerating the savaging of gay children in the school system for years. Bart and a mother with a gay son at HHS lobbied against it for years while the administration and Dr. Lennard fled the problem because they thought that their protecting gay children in school would annoy the homophobic bigots.

CTA did not one thing about this vile Professional Standards situation and knew about it for years. It knew and looked the other way when Linda Kipley acted like the administration's Lucco Brazzi. It discouraged Bart from appealing his treatment. CTA let teachers enter Kipley's den of sanctioned sadism without even a paper in their hands outlining their rights and resisted requests--I know I sent several--to see that such information as the appeals process should be in a teacher's hands when he or she got the call from Kipley to come to her Abu Gharib Cell Block.

In short, CTA colluded with the administration in mistreatment of teachers. That's vile. Moreover, it's uncivilized.

As a result of Bart's unyielding persistence, he has also got the promise of a letter of apology to him from La Kipley. Again, CTA had nothing at all to do with generating this promised letter. It cooperated with the administration in its mistreatment of Bart even when a CTA Pooh-Bah accompanied Bart to the punishment interview with Kipley; it did not succor Bart: quite the contrary--its members with the administration honchos at a Tiger Bay luncheon.

Bart was new to the club and scared, but he got up and protested his treatment to speaker Elia despite being frightened and despite being ignored by the CTA sycophants present.

Bottom line: CTA is in bed with the administration, which uses CTA ciphers to keep teachers scared and quiet. The CTA's relationship with the administration comes first in CTA's lexicon of skewed priorities; teachers, who fork over $500 a year out of meager salaries, come second to the administration, with whom CTA is in thrall, too scared to annoy any administrator, no matter how egregious his or her behavior toward teachers.
Shame on CTA. It dishonors organized labor. If you and your ilk had been around at the beginning of the labor movement in America, you would have seen not a thing wrong with child labor, sweat-shop hours, and inhumane working conditions. Instead, you would have chimed in to support the opponents of these practices to call Samuel Gompers crazy.

Pray accept my abiding contempt.

lee drury de cesare
15316 Gulf Boulevard 802
Madeira Beach, FL 33708


From: Montolino@aol.com [mailto:Montolino@aol.com]
Sent: Sunday, February 04, 2007 11:10 PM
To: Yvonne.Lyons@floridaea.org
Cc: Jean.Clements@floridaea.org; Chuck.Kiker@floridaea.org; tdecesar@tampabay.rr.com
Subject: Letter

Yvonne, Jean, and Chuck,
Tom Gonzalez tells me I will get the letter I continue to ask for......this is the letter Linda Kipley promised me in my meeting with her back in July 2005. Back then she said I would receive a letter that the meeting with her was satisfactory. However, I never received such a letter. Instead, I received what I feel was a threatening letter in a nasty tone with absolutely no wording stating that the meeting was satisfactory or the outcome was good. Around the same time I had a co-worker spread lies that I am about to be fired back when all this happened. He assumed this after a downtown person, who used to be a friend, told him the whole story.
I asked Tom Gonzalez to make sure the letter is the type that I can show anyone the letter as proof that I am not going to be fired to counteract rumors.
I wish CTA had made sure this letter was written to me back in August 2005. I think Kipley owed me this letter, and since she said I would receive it in the presence of a CTA rep, I should have received it.
But I am getting the letter through my own insistence. It is taking me almost 2 years to get the letter that Kipley owes me. Tom says I will get it. If I do, I will finally be able to put everything to rest and move on with my life. If I do not get it, I will probably attend every single school board meeting and talk about Linda Kipley owing me an apology for lying to my face during an investigation and for bringing up issues (a newspaper article and the Joe Stines emails) that she had no right to bring up during the investigation (and she even admitted I was not called into Professional Standards for those issues but she made a point of trying to scare me that MaryEllen Elia gave her those items).
I believe in being nice, but when I feel I have been wronged I will defend myself to the nth degree. I believe powerful people must be held accountable for their nonsense.
Below is a column about Molly Ivins. I believe CTA should work toward her goal: holding powerful people accountable......I feel that the culture at CTA is a "don't rock the boat, just work on FEA type issues that effect education, but don't make anyone important mad...." type of culture. It's a "let's help the teachers as long as it doesn't cause a rift in our relationship with the bigwigs" culture. I feel there are times you have to rock the boat and should, especially when it holds powerful people accountable and keeps them from abusing their power and harming others.
I am hoping the article below will inspire you all to be braver in helping teachers, when they have a problem or issue. I continue to be a CTA member, I continue to encourage new teachers to join, and, in return, I feel you owe teachers more when they are upset or in trouble.
Bart
Missing Molly Ivins
By PAUL KRUGMAN


Published: February 2, 2007
Molly Ivins, the Texas columnist, died of breast cancer on Wednesday.
I first met her more than three years ago, when our book tours
crossed. She was, as she wrote, "a card-carrying member of The Great
Liberal Backlash of 2003, one of the half-dozen or so writers now
schlepping around the country promoting books that do not speak
kindly of Our Leader´s record."

I can´t claim to have known her well. But I spent enough time with
her, and paid enough attention to her work, to know that obituaries
that mostly stressed her satirical gifts missed the main point. Yes,
she liked to poke fun at the powerful, and was very good at it. But
her satire was only the means to an end: holding the powerful
accountable.



She explained her philosophy in a stinging 1995 article in Mother
Jones magazine about Rush Limbaugh. "Satire ... has historically been
the weapon of powerless people aimed at the powerful," she wrote.
"When you use satire against powerless people ... it is like kicking
a cripple."
Molly never lost sight of two eternal truths: rulers lie, and the
times when people are most afraid to challenge authority are also the
times when it´s most important to do just that. And the fact that she
remembered these truths explains something I haven´t seen pointed out
in any of the tributes: her extraordinary prescience on the central
political issue of our time.
I´ve been going through Molly´s columns from 2002 and 2003, the
period when most of the wise men of the press cheered as Our Leader
took us to war on false pretenses, then dismissed as "Bush haters"
anyone who complained about the absence of W.M.D. or warned that the
victory celebrations were premature. Here are a few selections:
Nov. 19, 2002: "The greatest risk for us in invading Iraq is probably
not war itself, so much as: What happens after we win? ... There is a
batty degree of triumphalism loose in this country right now."
Jan. 16, 2003: "I assume we can defeat Hussein without great cost to
our side (God forgive me if that is hubris). The problem is what
happens after we win. The country is 20 percent Kurd, 20 percent
Sunni and 60 percent Shiite. Can you say, `Horrible three-way civil
war?´ "
July 14, 2003: "I opposed the war in Iraq because I thought it would
lead to the peace from hell, but I´d rather not see my prediction
come true and I don´t think we have much time left to avert it. That
the occupation is not going well is apparent to everyone but Donald
Rumsfeld. ... We don´t need people with credentials as right-wing
ideologues and corporate privatizers - we need people who know how to
fix water and power plants."
Oct. 7, 2003: "Good thing we won the war, because the peace sure
looks like a quagmire. ...
"I´ve got an even-money bet out that says more Americans will be
killed in the peace than in the war, and more Iraqis will be killed
by Americans in the peace than in the war. Not the first time I´ve
had a bet out that I hoped I´d lose."
So Molly Ivins - who didn´t mingle with the great and famous, didn´t
have sources high in the administration, and never claimed special
expertise on national security or the Middle East - got almost
everything right. Meanwhile, how did those who did have all those
credentials do?
With very few exceptions, they got everything wrong. They bought the
obviously cooked case for war - or found their own reasons to endorse
the invasion. They didn´t see the folly of the venture, which was
almost as obvious in prospect as it is with the benefit of hindsight.
And they took years to realize that everything we were being told
about progress in Iraq was a lie.
Was Molly smarter than all the experts? No, she was just braver. The
administration´s exploitation of 9/11 created an environment in which
it took a lot of courage to see and say the obvious.
Molly had that courage; not enough others can say the same.
And it´s not over. Many of those who failed the big test in 2002 and
2003 are now making excuses for the "surge." Meanwhile, the same
techniques of allegation and innuendo that were used to promote war
with Iraq are being used to ratchet up tensions with Iran.
Now, more than ever, we need people who will stand up against the
follies and lies of the powerful. And Molly Ivins, who devoted her
life to questioning authority, will be sorely missed.

Bart Birdsall
2309 W. Bristol Ave.
Tampa, FL 33609
home (813) 258-8817
cell (813) 362-7937
Montolino@aol.com



Friday, January 12, 2007


Dr. Lamb Shepherds an Information Pamphlet for Teachers Who Must Undergo the Ministrations of Linda Kipley's Simon-Legree Treatment in Her Abu Gharib Cell Block

Dr. Lamb: Bart Birdsall said he had a useful conversation with you today and that you applauded him for running for the School Board. So did my husband and I. We gave him some money and encouraged him all the way.

I liked that Bart ran to detoxify the idea that a gay couldn't do so, and the great thing is that he did not get one anti-gay taunt in the entire campaign. His run for office to make doing so more hospitable for gays is what I call higher politics. To change our culture, there have to be people who will step out front where more cautious and more conveniently political people won't. If you examine the history of our democracy, this was always so.

Bart ventured into that unknown territory. I think his Board run on principle will be something he will treasure when he is an old man. When he looks back on his life, he can say, "I ran for the Hillsborough County School Board" to make life better for gays in society and especially for the gay children in the school system."

He and Jane Bolton began their efforts to make the schools less toxic for gay students years ago--Jane had a gay son at my old school, Hillsborough; and these two pioneers bumped up against the prejudice of the school administration and, I am sorry to say, the Board too. I joined in with a little skirmish or two in the last days of their efforts. I once ran down Dr. Lennard in a pair of spiked Manohla Blanicks at Tiger Bay and caught him. He promised to form a committee to deal with the gay harassment. He didn't. I am sorry he dropped out of the Florida Senate race. I could hardly wait to get him on a platform where he had to field questions and couldn't run.The Board and administration apparently were afraid to challenge the bigots. I don't think he had the political instincts to win that election. A real politician knows when to veer in another direction because his political nose tells him the voters are going that way.

I believe Ms. Elia repeated this error with the last gay-club effort by reappointing the committee that reviewed the situation when the first committee came up with the advice to not notify the parents. The second committee, I understand, had the anti-gay complainers on it and reversed the previous decision.
I am sorry that the deluge of emails caused you to vote on the losing side. You should have voted your convictions. All politicians should. When you wrote me that reason for your vote and when I then heard that Ms. Falliera had boasted of sending out many emails to invite people to condone the notification that the gay students opposed, I asked you to have the Board attorney give an opinion on the legality of a Board member's using a school-supplied computer to engage in this kind of politicking on a Board item. I believe all of the Board members have a school computer at home and infer that Ms. Falliera used hers. The school email technicians in the Tech Department could determine whether Ms. Faliera's computer was used it to send out the political emails. I would like to know when the attorney renders an opinion on this question. I expect to include a copy of the email sent out on this issue and the email recipients' list. That is public information since it involves school business.

Ms. Elia and Ms. Faliera are the unfortunate possessors of bad political noses. They don't know when an idea's time has come. Ms. Kurdell is embalmed in my considered opinion and doesn't know anything but heil Hitler.

I thought it interesting that the gay kids had turned out a much more numerous body at the Board on this issue than had the homophobes. I congratulated every kid I could that night on their vigorous demonstration of democracy in action. I especially thanked the ACLU--of which I have been member for many years--for its support of the gay kids' side of the question. I thought a couple of USF people made outstanding statements. You can always trust academics to know valid data. But the kids were the stars. The boys who piled the books on the table to demonstrate their point will be important people one day. That kind of hustle and get-up-and-go at their age promises significant lives.

I am delighted that you will welcome Mr. Gonzalez's information booklet for the Professional Standards referrals. I wish you would put it on the Web for public review and comment. The teachers who enter the perilous precincts of Professional Standards badly need solid information. I tried to talk to Ms. Kipley about this booklet at the gay-club Board meeting. She spit out, "I don't have to talk to you!" and fled before my astonished eyes. Not only does Ms. Kipley not have the academic background for her important position, she lacks the poise and polish to respond to one of the public who pays her salary.

Ms. Kipley's progress from Home Ec to that job is a primie facie case of the administration shoddy employment practices. Ms. Elia would amend those if a majority of Board members made plain that they expect her to do so. She wants to keep her own job, which the Board controls.

I don't know whether you plan to contact the CTA on the Professional Standards pamphlet for teachers. I can tell you categorically that the organization cooperated with Kipley's savaging of teachers and did not think the issue worth the outfit's attention, although I understand the dues for a teacher is $500 a year. I consider the CTA corrupt and ineffectual, and I speak from the position of a former faculty union president at HCC.

Thank you for your hospitality to the information packet for teachers subjected to the treatment Ms. Kipley is infamous for in Professional Standards.

Lee Drury De Cesare